>>31
>Yes, being gay serves a slightly detrimental purpose for the propogation of the species and so is unnatural.
Touche! I never looked at it that way. However, that really can only slow down humanity's genetic progress a little. With over 7 billion people on the planet, how long before whatever superior traits the gay individual had occurs in a heterosexual individual? Unless you're in a rush to evolve into God, I wouldn't worry about it.
>>32
>Do we need *more* people on the planet?
I often think that way myself :). Sadly, I think we're due for a nuclear war any year now. We've got enough kooks in power for it. That ought to reduce the populus by quite a bit...*gulp*