I was in a counterstrike server the other day... and it had listed in the rules "no racism."
As I look through the list of players, I notice typical stupid names... and then I notice one that read something like this:
~{aZn}-=PriDe=-~
A while later, another person joined whose name read something like this:
~VieT-Pride~
So, heck, I decided I'd make one of my own:
-=White_Pride=-
Seeing my new, changed name, the admin got all testy, and requested that I change my name back, and slayed me once.
Does anyone else see the stupidity in all this?
You can make azn-pride, viet-pride, black-pride, mexican-pride, hell, anything but WHITE-pride, and that's just dandy. But the moment you make a name like WHITE-pride, you are a racist!
After the central, dominant jew problem, NIGGER SHIT-STINK is the next most serious affliction facing Americans today.
WHAT THE IDEAL MULTI-RACIAL STATE NEEDS IS A NIGGER THAT DON'T STINK.
To everyone with uncauterized nasal passages, the analysis below of this pervasive Amerikwan problem will be thorough and compelling. Its conclusions incontrovertible.
If you reside in Amerikwa, especially in big-city Amerikwa, you've surely had occasion to ask yourself this question a thousand times over.
WHY DO NIGGERS SMELL LIKE SHIT?
Why won't nigger shit-stink wash off?
Or, to ask the question theologically: Why would a just God make the nigger smell like a pile of shit?
The religious answer is obvious:
God wants blind people to hate niggers too.
There's also the thoroughly researched and well-known SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION for why niggers stink.
Sweat like a nigger. Stink like a nigger.
SCIENTIFIC BIOLOGICAL FACT: NIGGERS ARE BORN TO STINK. COMPARED TO OTHER RACES, NIGGERS GOT HUGELY OVERSIZED AND HIGHLY OVERACTIVE STINK GLANDS.
This isn't about mere differences though. You're using "differences" to enforce social policy when mankind has pretty much made up it's mind on how to treat each other.
You're just a petty racist, nothing seperates you from the KKK or nazis.
Name:
Anonymous2006-07-10 16:37
Europeans are more diplomatically inclined, Easterners are more mathematically inclined, Africans are more survival inclined, etc.
Name:
Xel2006-07-10 17:57
>>50 Oh yes, different races have different buffs. BECAUSE THIS IS OBLIVION!!!
Name:
Anonymous2006-07-10 23:10
>>49
So you agree that there are differences between races even though this fact may cause some people to wrongly use it to justify discrimination against certain races?
You're using the word "differences" as a place holder for "flaws" or "inferiorities". These percieved flaws or inferiorities suspiciously favor the race that have been known to habitally undermind the potential of other races. These percieved flaws or inferiorities have never been proven to be naturally occuring within any race, but instead more reasonable evidence points to culture. (Environment)
Arguing solely for nature at any point is a complete disregard for what we've already gleaned from science- that nature and nurture work in concert to form a complete person.
Name:
Anonymous2006-07-11 2:52
>>53
The chinese and non-black immigrants from poor countries (mexico, eastern europe, asia) to the US on average score higher on IQ tests than black americans. Therefore the environment is not the only factor. The similiarity in results for different races in similiar environments shows a strong trend with asians scoring the highest and sub-saharran africans the lowest. The nature of averages is such that there are blacks who are more intelligent and capable than asians.
From the facts meritocratic-eugenics would be preferable to anthropological-eugenics.
Name:
Xel2006-07-11 3:09
>>54 'From the facts meritocratic-eugenics would be preferable to anthropological-eugenics.' Don't worry, the American way of life already ruins the lives of those with the wrong beginnings - there is no reason to effectivize this system of exclusion any further via research.
Name:
Anonymous2006-07-11 3:47
<i>The chinese and non-black immigrants from poor countries (mexico, eastern europe, asia) to the US on average score higher on IQ tests than black americans. Therefore the environment is not the only factor.</i>
I'm not talking about "only", this is what you still don't get. I'm talking about "in concert"- when it comes to the human ability to cope in a human environment- it's always a combination. We shouldn't even be having this discussion until you're prepared to fully address the fact that nature and nurture do not work seperate or independant from each other. Ever. These are the most basic of facts, deal with them.
>>55
Exactly. Besides that, don't you imply that we already live in a meritocrat-eugenics society by virtue of the IQ test results(and the importance of those test results) and the precieved (see: subjective) positioning of the races? Guess what: According to you we pretty much already live in a Meritocratic Eugenics society and you know what? It still isn't working.
Name:
Anonymous2006-07-11 14:54
>>55
You show a poor understanding of meritocracy. Meritocracy is the polar opposite of aristocracy in terms of child-rearing and opportunity distribution. However you are right in saying the US is not a meritocracy in this aspect since there is no good approximation for equal opportunity apart from public schooling. Apart from child-rearing, the US is one of the closest countries to providing equal opportunity in the world due to it's extensive economic freedom.
Bear in mind meritocracy does not give people opportunities if they are unqualified as that would be in the same illogical realm as aristocracy. Ideally children would be given 3 square meals a day and educated and tested in various subjects especially critical thought and scientifically determinned what they are good at so they can make a better decisions with what marketable skills they should develop.