Holocaust denial

I have been reading a lot of stuff recently, some of which has disturbed me.  There are a lot of people out there who say the Holocaust, that horrible time in history they taught us about in school never really happened the way they say it did. 

They cite how there's no way camps like auschewits(sp?) had the capacity to eliminate as many people as they said were held there.  They talk about how zyklon-b wasn't really powerful enough to kill anyone, and those showers apparently outfitted with this chemical were actually used for a delousing procedure.  They talk about how it doesn't make any sense to trick people into going to their death when you've already got them in your custody.

I don't know man; holocaust deniers seem to have information to back them up, all kinds of evidence, to which the holocaust sympathizers only have name calling and questioning the motives of those who deny it.  I am someone who really would like to believe that the holocaust happened, if only so that I can believe there isn't a vast conspiracy behind it.  So, any holocaust sympathizers with a good rebuttal to what they're saying?

>>27
This is the primary reason eugenics doesn't work, it's interbreeding that leads inferior cultures to gain otherwise unattainable knowledge. Pockets of intellectually elite western, arab, and asian men could exist, but at the expense of everyone below them. We do not need them, but they desperately need us, and man is not selfish by nature, being formerly roving nomads, changing to community-driven lifestyles after discovering agriculture. (not to mention if you leave too many stupid people sitting around surrounding you, eventually one is going to make up a reason, usually religious, for them to hate you and bust open those walls.)
Essentially, our unselfish nature is what keeps us from killing off totally inferior ethnicities, no matter how many opportunities we had, and still have. If this is not true, how would you explain England never completely erradicating Africa? They had the means and manpower to take out every little tribe in the area below the northern 13% of the continent, and it wouldn't have taken long for reinforcements to arrive and start on the remainder. I believe greed is a subconcious moral balance that afflicts evil people, leading them to believe it would be beneficial to leave the indiginous people alive rather than executing the lot of them like the Vandals and the Mongols once did.

tl;dr: Man wtf is up with white people being hated on? They're the nicest conquerers ever, shit!
The only people we've truly screwed over were the various Injun tribes in the Americas.

>>30
If you visit Holocaust museums, the less knowledgeable ones (read: too small for the industry to bother correcting) have the true numbers posted, which of course don't add up to six million, or anywhere close, at all. I visited one such museum in high school, and after adding the numbers in my head, asked why. The answer was simply "Those numbers represent the ones we could find." As if we totally disappear after only a few decades? Hogwash! Even after being cremated there's still a few methods you can use to verify, at least, that the ashes were once human remains. Probably the only surefire way to dispose of evidence is a volcanic sacrifice, which just leaves a little carbon rock after awhile.