Why do women not analyze?

Men like to observe and find the truth in things, whether it be history, science, technology, etc.  Religions like to find and identify truths of behavior and morality, to their limited knowledge.  Comedians like to find and exagerate the truth for their audience, and even find some truths about women and relationships in their rambling.  Yet with all this truthfinding, women seem to avoid it.

Women will either adapt to a situation, go with it, or redirect it.  When men try to find out how women think or how relationships actually work, women are not forward with their information, and would rather be secretive than present analysis of how women think. 

Men like to point out the obvious, even to a vulgar level, which is why there are so many vulgar jokes or expressions.  Men will identify and exagerate their own traits, and percieved traits of others, from homos to women, and then make terminology and expressions for them.  But women rarely seem to do this.  They rarely talk about their own anatomy, so men do it instead to try to identify what's obvious. 

I'm sure women have a vast amount of knowledge and secrets, but they never let them out.  They keep everything hidden, never to revealed, and if anyone does figure it out they feel offended or betrayed.  An analogy would be dogs and cats.  Dogs show there emotion without hiding, and are more trustful.  Cats are mysterious, emotional, and change on a whim.  They can't be trusted to do anything, but they can be admired until they piss on your couch.  

Women are baby factories. Occasionally a better model comes along with more bells and whistles but that's outside the norm.

penis makes u superior

>>1
I agree with 95% of this. Women are inherently unsincere and (at least look) highly irrational.

The other 5% is regarding cats. They are complex and smarter, but you can get to know them. I can predict everything my cat's gonna do, including biting my hand because he doens't like what I'm doing.

>>4
Women basically want to always come out of the situation as the "good person" and try to make the situation as less awkward as possible. Even if that means saying some silly stuff and being unsincere. They never can just look at the situation as it is and forget about wat reputation they will get.

>>1

I'm a woman, and I think that we often feel the same about men. While it is true that we will try to settle something peacefully, other women will pick up on the undercurrents of our words. We might say, oh, it's okay, no harm done, and to other women, as well as ourselves, it is, die a thousand deaths you dirty whore. We often forget that men aren't as perceptive to the sublties that we use.

Women talk more with tone, expression, and hand gestures than with words. Sorry guys... you don't speak the language. But if you study us enough, you will be able to predict our behavior. And if you don't ever use harsh tones, we'll fuck you whenever you want. ^.-

women are stupid and deserve to be subjugated

>>7

You're an asshole and deserve to be castrated.

>>8
shut your hole and go back to the kitchen, bitch

People who follow women like Ayn Rand deserve to be castrated and subjugated.

Women think too much about the little things
Men think too much about the big things. By which, I mean giant titties

Women exist to be objectified. I don't see any other reason for women to exist except to serve man. Women do not have the intellectual ability nor the strong character required to be independent and self-sufficient. Women are needed only to carry babies and care for the babies. Also cooking, cleaning and serving as the cumbucket.

There are the stupid women, but what about the Marie Curies of this world? Even the women oppresive society of 1910 was not stupid enough to deny a genius opportunities because of her gender.

I say, take opportunities from the dumbasses who will spend it on whores and liquor and give it to the intelligent who will use it to code html.

While there are notable women, they are few are far between. It is a statistical abonormality. I feel comfortable disregarding them and labelling all women as unfit to be seen outside the house. Women who have truly contributed are very few and their actions are negated by those who have cause havoc to men's lives. Those lives which would have contributed greatly to the overall progress of society and civilization. Therefore, I feel that women are only needed to birth and care for babies, cooking, cleaning and serving as the cumbucket.

>>14
There is a problem in the practicality of this, we need to ensure those female geniuses get as much opportunity as possible from their childhood and not waste resources on those mischievous mingers that plague mankind. This would involve spending money on educating those who will spend all day home, raising kids, cooking and cleaning or some other menial tasks. I think a good compromise would be to teach females to read and write and then send them to a girls school when they reach the age of 11. There they will take 1 or 2 subjects which require intellect and those that do well in these subjects can go on to explore their abilities in further education.

We should also of course allow them access to libraries and various public organizations dedicated to education and socialising in certain fields of study.

Also in the spirit of meritocracy discriminate only on their merits when it comes to applying for university or jobs.

>>15
While I cast doubt on these female geniuses (they are too few to matter), the number might rise with proper education.

One has to weigh the merits of a proper literate populace and a mother who can teach her children the abc's on one hand and the possible annoyances caused by having well-read wives and daughters. Within the proper framework, educating females might work.

If females do get educated, I think sending them to a girl's school is a fine idea. Females learn better in girl's schools and choose a wider range of subjects.

I think it is possible for the average female, after education, to have the intellectual capability to teach primary, even secondary school. Maybe for seconday schools, it would take those female geniuses. The professionals would have to be women whose children have grown up or spinsters or widows for I don't think a women should manage mothering and work at the same time.

>>16
Girl school = lesbian factory

>>17
orly. maybe temporary lesbians...i don't know

>>18
That's because they sexually mature first, though males mature faster to make up for it.
Seriously one day I just woke up and went from "neenerneener cooties" to "Fuck I wanna hit that bitch."

>>19
Same here.

>>16
It is definitely true that all girl's school do perform way better. And they end up pretty ok. On the flip side boy's school tend to be so crap and half the boys end up with no social skills with the opposite sex.

>>21
? Are u sure? Girls schools are generally better than boys schools, but all boys always score higher than unisex schools. Obviously due to how girls mature faster. I think this is more to do with the fact that most all boys and all girls schools are funded by free market economics rather than a huge bureaucracy choked communist morass however.