Why do women not analyze?

Men like to observe and find the truth in things, whether it be history, science, technology, etc.  Religions like to find and identify truths of behavior and morality, to their limited knowledge.  Comedians like to find and exagerate the truth for their audience, and even find some truths about women and relationships in their rambling.  Yet with all this truthfinding, women seem to avoid it.

Women will either adapt to a situation, go with it, or redirect it.  When men try to find out how women think or how relationships actually work, women are not forward with their information, and would rather be secretive than present analysis of how women think. 

Men like to point out the obvious, even to a vulgar level, which is why there are so many vulgar jokes or expressions.  Men will identify and exagerate their own traits, and percieved traits of others, from homos to women, and then make terminology and expressions for them.  But women rarely seem to do this.  They rarely talk about their own anatomy, so men do it instead to try to identify what's obvious. 

I'm sure women have a vast amount of knowledge and secrets, but they never let them out.  They keep everything hidden, never to revealed, and if anyone does figure it out they feel offended or betrayed.  An analogy would be dogs and cats.  Dogs show there emotion without hiding, and are more trustful.  Cats are mysterious, emotional, and change on a whim.  They can't be trusted to do anything, but they can be admired until they piss on your couch.  

>>14
There is a problem in the practicality of this, we need to ensure those female geniuses get as much opportunity as possible from their childhood and not waste resources on those mischievous mingers that plague mankind. This would involve spending money on educating those who will spend all day home, raising kids, cooking and cleaning or some other menial tasks. I think a good compromise would be to teach females to read and write and then send them to a girls school when they reach the age of 11. There they will take 1 or 2 subjects which require intellect and those that do well in these subjects can go on to explore their abilities in further education.

We should also of course allow them access to libraries and various public organizations dedicated to education and socialising in certain fields of study.

Also in the spirit of meritocracy discriminate only on their merits when it comes to applying for university or jobs.