>>14
It began with me liking thin women more that others, then it went downhill. I must say the craving has been there all the time, lying latent. I wouldn't touch a child in a sexual way, ever, though. >>27
What are you? Retard? Maybe it doesn't "make sense" from an evolutionary standpoint, but guess what? It can't be controlled.
This thread is too long. I don't want to read on.
Name:
Anonymous2005-09-11 11:03
There are plenty of thin cherubim women who are 18 or older. You could find a 17 yr old and tell her to wait a year. You don' need a young girl just because it makes you feel like a porn star in size comparison.
Name:
Anonymous2005-09-11 14:46 (sage)
If you must reply to this troll, please sage your reply.
Name:
sage2005-09-11 21:44
sage
Name:
Anonymous2005-09-11 21:46
>>245
Then what's the argument for minors that look like they're 27?
Name:
Anonymous2005-09-12 5:56
>>248
Stop putting hormones in the water supply, you're ruining the loli.
Name:
Anonymous2005-09-12 6:23
<Inst#cspell>
They say it's the fluorine. Oh, and lolis look best medium rare.
Name:
Anonymous2005-09-12 6:50 (sage)
If anything says something about the collective intelligence of world4ch, this is it.
There actually are ex-pedophiles. Basically psychiatrists brainwash them into thinking they are not pedophiles.
Name:
Anonymous2005-09-12 13:22
>>15
this is just a deception and a fallcy. all it is , is the 'slippery slope argument' so dont be afraid. There is no reason that repression will lead to curiosity, depending on the person (the person will react in a disgusted way or his whole body might react negatively towards pedo). Theres no reason that curiosity can just 'mutate' into desire. And if you are pedo it doesnt mean that you will collect or produce cp and openly distribute the images (that is a sure way to get caught).
I like to slaughter my giraffe to little girls that look like ewoks. I can't help it. My throepist, she said that it is up to me to get help and that she will try to help. I don't want help I like it but I know I need it. They are usually hairy black girls with crusty lips and snot coming out of their nose. Snot that has cruste up and glistens still. When I see one I get her stuck in my mind so badly that I go homw really quick and fuck my cock with my knees and punch myself into a casket God. This continues for hours on until I am blinded aka unconcious from the pleasure.
The only thing that can help is when they don't look like ewoks cause they are wearing doo-rags. that really helps changed everything. I then proceed to my car with my suit case of watermelons to feel them instead of c=jerking it to them.
I know I know I have serious problems but you would do it to if you worked in a chex mix factory for more than 10 of your adult years.
I love you Ewok.
Name:
Anonymous2005-09-29 20:10
c=jerking
what the hell is that c= crap?
Name:
Anonymous2005-10-01 1:33
>>17 >>18
omg, are you serious??? You really don't know??? Trust me, I'm sure that LOTS of men have fantasized about having sex with underage girls. I have. Whatever. I don't give a fuck. I don't feel guilty about it. I don't think it's inherently wrong to be horny for children, and I don't think it's some kind of sickness either. However, people who can't control their desires need help. Like I said, I've been aroused by children, but I don't touch them or anything.... just like I don't try to go for 99.9% of girls that I think are hot. I wouldn't rape a child, even if there was no chance of getting caught because I wouldn't rape anyone or hurt anyone like that. But if sexing up children was socially acceptable, and we lived in a world where having sex with children didn't have severe consequences for the child, then I'd have sex with them.
Child sex is illegal because there is too much potential for the child to be hurt. But BELIEVE ME, many many many men have at least a few times been horny for a child. If there were no laws, children would be fucked all the damn time. So, thoughts of sex with children are not rare at all,... but it is good that sex with children is illegal because too many children would get messed up otherwise.
Still, I contest that a man who occasionally has thoughts of having sex with children is completely normal.
Name:
Anonymous2005-10-01 6:05
Thread is moot. (especially on a board formerly associated with lolicon)
Rape is rape. (quit trying to rationalize your need for something you can't have)
"The current study is the largest to date to employ pedophilic stimuli and genital measures with men drawn from a community sample of volunteers. The current results suggest that sexual arousal to pedophilic stimuli occurs among a sizable minority of normal men who report no pedophilic behavior and is not necessarily associated with pedophilic behavior. Consistent with previous data (Barbaree & Marshall, 1989; Briere & Runtz, 1989; Fedora et al., 1992; Freund & Watson, 1991), 20 % of the current subjects self-reported pedophilic interest and 26.25 % exhibited penile arousal to pedophilic stimuli that equaled or exceeded arousal to adult stimuli."
Maybe there should be a Kinsey Scale for Pedo. Y'know, 0 for no interest whatsoever, 1-2 for sometimes having fantasies but no serious fixtation, and 6 if you use the Kids R Us catalogue as a faprag.
Name:
Anonymous2005-10-02 16:38
>>267
I think this was said somewhere in the thread. ZOMG YOU JUST MANTLED >>25
Name:
Anonymous2005-10-04 15:41
>>267
dumbass, that's too tame for 6. *I* do that and I'd rate myself as a 3. 6 is like, Marc Dutrox or whomever.
Name:
Anonymous2005-10-05 15:21
What you need is like simultaneious major disasters occuring all at the same time period. A hurricane here. A terrorist bombing here. A great famine there. Another genocide occcuring over there.
Then you can really see how bias some medias can be.
Unfortunately all such things starting all at the same time might be highly unlikely?
Of all the terms related to pedophilia (e.g., pedophile, pedophiliac, pedophilia...), pedophilia is the oldest. Here is the oldest source cited by the Oxford English Dictionary:
1906 H. ELLIS Stud. Psychol. Sex V. i. 11 Paidophilia or the love of children..may be included under this head [sc. abnormality].
Source: OED.com
I don't know who H. Ellis is, but he's not Freud... and he appears to be defining pedophilia. Even if he didn't coin the term, at the time of usage, it is obviously new enough that even the technical audience that would have been reading his book wasn't aware of what it meant. If you flip through any psychology textbook published in the last couple of decades, I assure you that they assume you know what a pedophile is.
Name:
Anonymous2005-10-09 10:48
I was thinking more in the lines of 'he gave children sexuality from the perspective of the general populace'. ie. normal people began to think that children were sexual creatures.
i know that in the Victorian era, children were thought to be asexual creatures. now everybody thinks of children as sexual; was it because of Freud? i don't read much psychology stuff, but i think he started those ideas in the psychology world and it became widespread.
when more of the populace is exposed to the idea of children as sexual, then more people will be pedophiles. this does relate to other sexual fetishes. i don't think the average furry or gay would have even thought about becoming that if there weren't already a group ready to spread those ideas.
>>274
H. Ellis may have invented the term pedophilia but did he think of children as sexual? Him calling it an abnormality does not count because it is still called that.
Pedophiles tend to have a very specific personality type. It's very good for women to have this certain personality type, but men with it become pedos. It's the mother-type personality, I forget it's designation in psychological terms.
Name:
Anonymous2005-10-11 23:52
>>279
So wait, it's good for women to be nurturing and caring, but bad for men because it leads to them wanting to fuck kids?