Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Attn:pinkos

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 7:24

I have to ask you a question: what is "equal" supposed to mean when you're comparing two people? I seriously can't think of a single situation where any two people are truly equal. Even in the most rigidly defined cultures, there are always variations. We're not machines. "Equality" has always seemed to me like an impossible ideal.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 7:39

Under things like the American Declaration of Independance, I assume equal means something along the lines of entitled to equal treatment under the law etc.

However, it was written in a time when slavery was still common, and Jefferson himself owned slaves, so how he thought this could be true I don't know.  How it could also be a self-evident truth is also a little strange.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 9:21

>>2
If you keep niggers in your house/garden you will soon find out that they are not fully human.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 9:24

>>3
Tsk.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 12:15

Blacks, really, what do they contribute to society? How are they equal? Why do people say they're just as intelligent as anyone else? Just compare these two sites... http://stormfront.org (all white users) and http://rapflava.com/ (mostly blacks).

There's no denying it, blacks are pathetic.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 13:32

>>5
I'm not sure what you're trying to prove here. The first thing I clicked on, naturally, was The Lounge, which brought me to this thread-

http://rapflava.com/forums/showthread.php/49-massachusetts-senate

Doesn't seem like a terrible place.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 16:14

>>1
why don't you ask whoever wrote your sacred founding writings

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 18:25

>>2
Equal under the law didn't truly happen until after the Civil War and the passing of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 18:36

>>8
implying we have equal protection now

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 18:37

>>9
It's a lot better now than it was way back when. Also, knock it off with the implying bullshite, it makes you look unintelligent.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 18:38

>>10
implying I'm not unintelligent

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 18:40

>>11
Just because you can execute proper Shiitchan quotes, does not mean you're not a shitposter. Go back to the imageboards.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 18:45

>>12
implying you aren't getting trolled

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 19:53

>>12
>implying implications are quotes

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 20:54

>>13-14
Fuck off back to the imageboards.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 21:18

>>15
You go?

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 21:21

>>16
Go where?

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 21:24

>>17
Back to the imageboards.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 21:25

>>18
No, because I'm not a shitposting moron.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 21:28

>>19
Maybe not, buy you aren't contributing anything good, either.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 21:39

>>20
you aren't contributing anything good, either.
How would you know? I've been on /lounge/ for quite some time and I've contributed my fair share of content. Right now, I'm simply just telling the drooling /b/tards and imageboard morons bringing in their imageboard retardery with them to fuck off. Read http://dis.4chan.org/read/lounge/1292798449/9,13 for more information.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 21:51

>>21
So you're tskface, that's not surprising. Are you also the guy who posts "failed cite" after every fart man post? (just wondering)

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 21:53

>>22
So you're tskface
There's more than one person who does that.
Are you also the guy who posts "failed cite" after every fart man post? (just wondering)
No, that's some other lounger.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 21:57

>>23
There's multiple people who post "Tsk." but there's only one Tskface (he posted the latter post you linked to).

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-24 22:02

>>24
but there's only one Tskface
Just like there's more than one "jerkface", there's more than one "Tskface". Like I said, there's multiple people who post it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 1:15

Everyone in this thread (excluding me of course, duh.) needs to get the fuck on back to the imageboards!

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-25 1:33

>>26
Only the OP, a few rude louts, and the >implying shitposters need to get back there. Everyone else, including me and you, can stay.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List