Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

HEY ATHIESTS

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-11 7:57

IF DINOSAURS DISPROVE THE BIBLE HOW COME THE UNDERWATER DINOSAURS DIED WHEN THE COMET HIT?

ENJOY THE DESPAIR THIS REVELATION MUST CAUSE

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-13 2:48

So your argument is, "[dinosaurs don't disprove the bible] (conclusion) [because underwater dinosaurs died when the comet hit] (premise)." If there is an implication, I'd like to know what it is cause I am not inferring anything of value from your argument.

This statement is the prime example of non sequitur.

Non sequitur (Latin for "it does not follow"), in formal logic, is an argument in which its conclusion does not follow from its premises.

:/

HEY CREATIONISTS

IF DINOSAURS DON'T DISPROVE THE BIBLE THEN HOW CAN THE BIBLE SAY ONE THING WHEN THERE IS EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY AND STILL REMAIN HISTORICALLY ACCURATE?

ENJOY YOUR DESPAIR THIS CONCLUSIVE STATEMENT DOES CAUSE.

:/

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-13 3:11

>>2
I thought you were somewhat theistic though, lol.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 3:31

>>3
are you serious...didn't we both just read what OP had posted? This person doesn't even understand continuity let alone logic! They're entirely delusional and full of self-gratifying grandeur; they're nuts!

But just because I'm a theist, don't lump us all into this one retarded person's viewpoint. Personally, I would love to make sure this person was heavily medicated or hospitalized immediately until their megalomania subsides.

Theistic yes, reasonable and logical definitely; accept things at face value? Not on your life. I am altruistic for truth. I will not be denied.
Besides, I see the bible as a means to an end and not a history book of accurate tellings. Sorry if this offends some head-up-ass religifags, but well, you do it to yourselves...I'm just the one holding the mirror.

:/

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 5:59

>>4
Mister irk-face, you dine this night on my thumbs up!

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 6:02

>>4
I see. Carry on.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-15 22:19

...and because appearances can be deceiving that brings me to my final point.

We are not here because we are free. We are here because we are NOT free.

"None are more hopelessly  enslaved than those who think they are free." -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-16 3:49

I am a slave, hence I wear a collar, a belt, wrist cuffs, and ankle cuffs with chain links hanging off them. When I die, I'm having them removed because I'll finally be free.

:/

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-16 15:13

WHY IS /LOUNGE/ BECOMING /B/?

WHYYYY

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-17 3:53

>>9
simple, /b/ requires an text board...no text board exists for /b/, therefore /lounge/ = /b/.

:/

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-17 4:05

>>10
http://dis.4chan.org/VIP/

Stay there, newfag. Lounge is for people who have been using 4chan since 2006 and earlier. OK?!

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-17 5:23

>>11
newfag
Back to /b/, please

Well, I'm qualified to be here, even though I haven't been using 4chan since 2006. Since I have respect for world4ch. Though, I agree, smirkface guy is annoying.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-17 15:01

>>12
you're my play thing, why would I abandon you now?

:/

>>11
Go 404 yourself. That place is for oldfags since '06.

:/

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-10 21:45

>>13
God, you sound just like a typical shitposter from /b/. No awareness at all.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List