HEY ATHIESTS

IF DINOSAURS DISPROVE THE BIBLE HOW COME THE UNDERWATER DINOSAURS DIED WHEN THE COMET HIT?

ENJOY THE DESPAIR THIS REVELATION MUST CAUSE

So your argument is, "[dinosaurs don't disprove the bible] (conclusion) [because underwater dinosaurs died when the comet hit] (premise)." If there is an implication, I'd like to know what it is cause I am not inferring anything of value from your argument.

This statement is the prime example of non sequitur.

Non sequitur (Latin for "it does not follow"), in formal logic, is an argument in which its conclusion does not follow from its premises.

:/

HEY CREATIONISTS

IF DINOSAURS DON'T DISPROVE THE BIBLE THEN HOW CAN THE BIBLE SAY ONE THING WHEN THERE IS EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY AND STILL REMAIN HISTORICALLY ACCURATE?

ENJOY YOUR DESPAIR THIS CONCLUSIVE STATEMENT DOES CAUSE.

:/