>>20
Notice the use of the phrase 'at least'? That means the percentage was just an estimate.
No, "at least" indicates a number that is the least amount to be taken as true. That 40% is the number. And that number was NOT indicated to be an estimate. To indicate an estimate, you use terms like "maybe" and "about".
Religitards? Religifags? Gilgamesh Era? WTF are you talking of?
If you were here a year ago, you would have known. Go to /sci/ and start searching.
You're a troll.
I want discussion. So let's discuss.
You admitted it while you were drunk.
I made no such admission and I don't get drunk at any rate. You must have been talking with a cloan. RedCream has MANY cloans -- fuck, you're ONE OF THEM! -- which the simplest survey of these threads would rationally conclude. Are you saying you haven't surveyed these threads, or that you're not rational?
You're just trolling.
No, I'm not.
You're not really mad, you're just trying to get people mad.
No, I'm angry about the religifags and other mental retards who are trying to bring Theocracy back in the West. Those who are religious are PROVABLY WRONG. Their gods don't exist since the allegations of their existence imply LOADS OF EVIDENCE would be laying around for us to examine. In extreme contrast, there is ZERO EVIDENCE. So their gods just don't exist. That's a prime computation. So what's fucking wrong with the religinuts that they live their lives without obeying the supremacy of evidence? That's just crazy.
Subtle difference.
MOAR LIEK so subtle that
you just fucking imagined it all.