>>1
I have noticed that any thread with RedCream in the title is guaranteed at least fifty replies.
Really? I haven't kept track. That's a pretty good response, isn't it?
The word RedCream is mentioned in at least 40% of all the posts on the textboards.
WAO! Hao did you notice that? Did you run a program in the 4chan Firefag extension?
Why?
I find myself puzzled, also. I had a lot of fun in the Gilgamesh Era with taunting the religtards, but that's long been over and the religifags have been more subdued ever since.
... why was RedCream getting so much attention while quality posts by anonymous posters went unheeded?
I'd hate to have that being the case. I want discussion, not a monobloc of topics.
RedCream's spamming of single words like KIKES and FISTING ...
WHOOP! WHOOP! WHOOP! Sorry, that isn't me. I don't spam.
... and his trolling of any thread to do with religion or politics didn't seem to warrent this "almost" homosexual reverence for the 'Cream.
Isn't discussion with strongly-held views much akin to trolling? If we can't get mad about religion and politics, then what the JEEPERS-ING FUCK can we really get mad about?