Is it possible to be a pedophile at the age of fifteen?
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-26 2:14
Yes. Anyone capable of sexual feelings is susceptable regardless of age.
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-26 2:15
Is it normal/common?
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-26 2:22
Children need sex.
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-26 2:33
>>3
Maybe. I don't think it can be easily studied among the general population because it's not something someone would discuss with some survey taker on the phone. Anyway, your mind and thoughts are your own and not something to obsess or worry about, or you'll go nuts. But keep your hands to yourself.
if a 15 year old ogles an 11 year old it doesn't really sound that bad, though if he wanted to pork a baby or toddler that could be fucked up
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-26 5:33
Yes! If you are 14 and think a 17 year old is hot I'd shoot you, you sick son of a bitch. I don't want sick fucks like you walking around in MY country, sucking up MY tax dollar.
>>8
umm..yeah it does. 11 years old is elementary/middle school you perv
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-26 15:55
11 year olds, dude...
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-26 17:38
So a 14 y/o thinking a 17 y/o is hot is perverted? Since when?
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-26 18:04
11 --------c=3 15=Pedophilia?
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-26 22:05
I agree that a grade schooler is usually too young, but you don't know what joy is until you've seen a junior highschool-age girl writhing in ecstasy on top of you.
Name:
LordRiordan2006-11-26 22:09
This topic is totally smurfing.
Name:
LordRiordan2006-11-26 22:09
>>17
From this message and on, any message that is supposedly by LordRiordan and is negative towards LordRiordan should be disregarded. The meaning of this message may not be revoked by LordRiordan. By reading this message you agree.
Name:
LordRiordan2006-11-26 22:10
My penis is 3 parsec long and can impregnate the universe.
Name:
LordRiordan2006-11-26 22:12
>>19
From this message and on, any message that is supposedly by LordRiordan and is negative towards LordRiordan should be disregarded. The meaning of this message may not be revoked by LordRiordan. By reading this message you agree.
Name:
LordRiordan2006-11-26 22:14
Who is following me around and trolling? :p
Name:
LordRiordan2006-11-26 22:14
>>21
From this message and on, any message that is supposedly by LordRiordan and is negative towards LordRiordan should be disregarded. The meaning of this message may not be revoked by LordRiordan. By reading this message you agree.
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-26 23:23
Hey everybody
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-27 0:07
hey
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-27 2:27
>>14 So a 14 y/o thinking a 17 y/o is hot is perverted? Since when?
It's sick, and anyone sane recognizes it, don't tell me *you* are a pedophile too, you sick son of a bitch?
I think the term "pedophilia" sucks because the manner in which society uses the word, which literally means "love of children", assumes all love of children is sexual. Thus, usage of the word in its current sense is a slight to parents and grandparents everywhere, schoolteachers, nannies, au-pairs, and others who cherish children as CHILDREN, not as little adults. Why not a different term - "pedofag", combining "pedo" for child with the traditionally anti-gay slur "fag" - to refer to the perverts who have illegitimate desires on kids?
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-27 11:31
lol morals
Name:
Anonymous2006-11-27 11:31
>>18 >>20 >>22
I disagree with you. therefore, your statement is an oxymoron.