Can someone explain furry-ism to me?

I just don't understand what could possibly be sexually appealing. Pedophilism makes sense, because although it's a warped sexuality it's focused on human beings. (I'm not a pedo, btw.) But furry-ism goes against nature. We are not genetically programmed to want to fuck animals or people who look like animals--we are programmed to want to fuck human beings.

Someone explain.

lol im a computer too ^__^

>>1
Any hole is fine.

"We are not genetically programmed to want to fuck animals or people who look like animals--we are programmed to want to fuck human beings."

Welcome to sentience.  Please, lurk more and enjoy your stay.

>>1
So, furryism goes against nature, but pedophilia doesn't?
Go back to not4chan.

lol furries

>>3
doesn't get much/any.

A

C
A
T

I
S

F
I
N
E

T
O
O

http://etherchan.org/wiki/index.php/Furries

I think that those who like furry are not attracted to the fact that the subjects used are animals, rather, the fact that furry provides a conduit to explore a kind of "new" and "fresh" variety of counter-cultural pornography -especially if the characters are made to look identical to humans. And in almost all furry, this is the case; that there are clear human traits in terms of intercourse and how it is done. For example, I don't think that dogs sleep in beds. The fact that the characters act human is enough for some, although weak a connection it may be.

onoes

>>10
In other words they're all just fucking bored.

>>4
Sentience and biological determinism are not mutually exclusive you stupid fuck.

>>8
has aids.

>>9
The link is down.

>>14
try sageing harder

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy