Get rid of /l/

lolicon = the devil. death to not4chan for it is illegal.

>>34
Yep, and that's why violent movies, pornography, video games and fictional rape should be illegal

/l/ is technically illegal, but there are 2 laws that state 2 entirely different truths.  One says that is is illegal, one says that it is not.  the 4chan party van can't do anything about /l/ because you are protected by the governments contradiction.  if you don't like /l/, just don't go there.  it does require going to an entirely different site after all.

two word 'Bull Shit!"

Lolicon can be mistaking for midgets with flat or perky tits.....HEHEHEHHEHEH

They are all 18 or over.  You cannot prove otherwise.

>>46

canada is on its way (or was until steven harper came in) to fully legalize gay marriage and marijuana. what they forgot was ... to legalize loli.
nevar forget.

shut up

>>26
I agree, although I can see where certain fetishes (like loli) can make people uncomfortable, and thus would want them off their favorite website.
The isolation we create is, in my opinion, a sort by-product of our increased capacity to communicate. The internet, cell phones, etc. make it easier to interact with some text than a person, face to face. I get bothered by people who claim not to be able to live without their cell phones. A decade ago they were toys for rich people, now it's a major concern whether we let our 7 year olds have one.
Our jobs run our lives because we as a society made sure you can't take a shit without paying someone something. People who have more money than you can ever dream of would love to sue for having an idea similiar to theirs.
I think corporations will cause something more like "Blade-runner" than 1984, but that's just me.

what the hell are you people talking about

theres no /l/ on 4chan

>>52
see
>>1

look-the arguement here is whether drawn CP is legal or not, right?  Then I raise this question: CP is against the law because it harms children, but how can a drawn picture be harmed?

>>1-1000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Suicide is the answer.

>>54
It doesn't harm the children if they like it.

OP is a witch who raped baby Satan. Ban him and burn him.

>>20
You have touched on the bigger issue here:  If a person is unable to control their actions, this makes them very dangerous.  It means that its not just about a person abusing a child, but could cause rape or violence against anyone.

lets face facts
/l/ will never be removed unless moot gets threatened by the FBI or some shit
this is a good thing.

It it amazing the number of doctors of pyschology and telepaths and loli haters we have here. And supposed lawyers too for that matter.
.
One thing I have noticed is that throughout the modern history of mankind and governments in the last 100 years or so, the more the "majority" of people or governments have tried to ban or supress something because it did not want to understand it or wanted to exert its total control over, the more invasive, evasive and prevelant and exploited that thing has become.
Take alcohol for instance. The United States enacted a prohibition against all forms of alcohol as a "safety and health" measure for its citizens. But the harder that the US fought to supress or stop people from enjoying a drink or two, the more people found ways to subvert or import thier favored drink of choice from either bootleggers, moonshiners or international brewers and wineries. (The US never did win on that front).
.
Take the drug trade. Rather than trying to understand what it is that leads people to want to try or use drugs in the first place and educate the people about it, a lot of countries only saw the after-effects of drugs and have therefore tried to halt its sale and production with stiff penalties and jail sentences; to little avail. The only thing that has happened is that drug manufacturers went underground and started to refine thier trade, thier product, and the ways in which it circumvents countries from stopping it. And notably though most countries like to purport major seizures and drug bust; crippling the drug trade in various localities they say, all they've really done is driven up the price of the product and made it look more economically profitable to those who would of otherwise not of dabled in the trade in the first place. Can anyone say Crystal Meth? The current favored drug of choice?
.
Now we have the topic of lolicon on the internet. We have lots of people on both sides of the fence as well as quite a few sitting on the middle of it debating its positives and negatives as it pertains to the effects it has on the human being and society at large. Who's more right? That's not for just me or just you to decide. We are all allowed to have and voice our opinions on it, but thats all. I've noticed that people love to throw bits and chunks of case law in thier arguments that pertain to thier angle on the issue but almost no one really wants to study or understand the human condition towards the imagery of drawn lolicon; just supress or deny it as a whole (as if thats all it will take to make it go away. Its like closing your eyes to the tornado thats bearing down on you. Just because you want to deny that its there and coming at you doesn't mean it just up and disappear on you.)
I've also noticed that a lot of you love lumping the naturist and nudist condition in with those you call pedophiles. And being a nudist myself, I'd just like to make clear that the photography, possesion and drawn imagery of nude children does NOT make one a pedophile. The only way pedophilia starts to come into play is if the said imagery (real, imagined or drawn) has the "children" involved in sexually implicit and explicit positions; Purposful open displays of sexuality that is meant to draw the viewer ,subjectively or objectively, into first looking at the genitilia of the subject (oral/manual/sexual stimulation of the genetilia). Real images of this type of Child Porn is illegal in most countries of the world. Drawn imagery how-ever is still a contested topic for debate on a country to country basis. Some view it as artisism and not CP as not actual live or dead individuals are involved where as others like to lump it in with a larger brush as being CP and therefore illegal not matter if real individuals were involved or not. As I said, its a topic for debate. 
.
But all this is just one persons view point. Take issue with it if you like. Its your right. But remember that I'll view your comments in the same light as I post mine in.

Give back not4chan, and everything will go back to silence and peace

>>37

Haha. Thanks for the laugh.

>>18

Pedophilia is illegal and considered quite a nasty perversion, and rightly so. Most lolicon, however, deals with girls who are in the early stages of puberty. This is technically Ephebophilia. From a biological perspective, as soon as a girl is fertile she's fair game. Girls become fertile very, very early in the stages of puberty (it differs, but it's a general rule). Age restrictions on relationships were generally put into place not because it's "wrong" or "evil" to get a girl pregnant at any early age would be counterproductive, as she wouldn't be physically or mentally prepared to look after a child. Indeed, not so long ago, when life expectancy was much lower than it was now, the aim was to have children as early as possible. It wasn't uncommon for people to have children as early as their late teens.

Also, attraction to pubescent girls is normal: it's a biological function that people have very little control over. Acting on this is usually a bad thing, at least in our society.

But I guess most people think girls gain tits overnight the second they reach 21 and have a fully-functional knowledge of sex and its implications at the same time. It's delivered by the sex-fairy who comes in the middle of the night and doesn't even call back.

Idiot.

I blame reading The Bluest Eye when I was in high school. That fucked up my head.

>>26
I'd like to make a comment on how the best arguments always fall on deaf ears, but GEEZE. Use some PARAGRAPHS. Not everyone enjoys reading a brick.

give us not4chan back!

>>12
In US it's legal unless you can provide us proof that it's illegal.

>>63
LOLOLOLO! Pedophilia is legal. Fucking children or downloading real child porn isn't. Did you know that most males who work with children are pedophiles? Enjoy that fact when you have kids.

WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED TO NOT4CHAN?!?!!?

how about i simplify.

CP and lolikon ARE DIFFERENT.
lolikon'ers and pedophiles ARE DIFFERENT.

lolikon distracts a lot of people from the real kids and keeps some people from becoming child abusers(molesting kids)

PEDOPHILES  = have sex or forced sex with children
PEDOPHILES  = damage kids for life witch makes more pedo's.

LOLIKON'ers = look at pic's drawn by other loli fans.
LOLIKON'ers = never hurt anyone with there loli's.

lolikon IS LEGAL IN AMERICA.

GOD DOES NOT EXIST.
 
IF YOU CAN'T UNDERSTAND THIS YOUR A RETARD.

those of you who say that lolikon is sick and wrong, need to realize that your morality is a load of shit that you have made up to try to seem like your better than everyone else. when you are the lowest scum life has to offer. all you can do is attack other peoples fetishes and preferences, because you are afraid to admit that you mite like what your seeing. and you think your imaginary god mite get mad at you. when all your really doing is wasting your life and our time.
so in short why don't you all GO KILL YOUR SELVES and make life easier for the rest of us. IGNORANT PEACES OF SHIT!!

>>70
Pedophiles = fap and dream, lolicon and legal child erotica allows them to keep it legal
Pedophile nutcases with no self-control = fuck kids

Simple.

It's not so simple though.  Even with the porn, having to go your entire life celibate is just too much to ask.  Look at Catholic priests, celibacy has a very spotty record, and the alternative(actually having sex with children)  Like Dennis Miller said, the safest, best way to deal with the problem of being a pedophile is to remove your self from society, completely, if that means suicide, so be it.

Any idea when Not4chan is going to go back up?

>>72
Most pedos aren't just attracted to Children and are infact married.

bah there are others imageboards beside not4chan, like http://rori.crimsondays.com/ for example :o

>>70 IF YOU CAN'T UNDERSTAND THIS YOUR A RETARD.
Like 71 said, there's a difference between a pedophile (someone who is attracted to prepubecent persons), and a rapist (someone who can't/doesn't control themselves regarding hot-dicking charity work).
The media puts them in the same boat because it sells. Everyone who bases their views entirely on media input is probably closer to be retarded than a person against lolicon due to personal issues and experiances.

>>71
I think lolicon/shotacon are just gender specific versions of the english term pedophile. In Japan, it doesn't matter if the person is real of fabricated- you can still be labeled as such.
None the less, I still think there's a fundemental difference between drawn loli/shota and actual CP; because you can find one attractive, and yet the other not so. I think even US law rules accordingly. An image has to resemble an actual photograph only so much for it to be classified as genuine CP.

well we still have koChan and 420chan, but not4chan was/is the most known, it must come back

If lolicon was made illegal, I would seriously think that the crime rates of CP will increase, as men will have to look for real mediums to satisfy their needs. So leave those loli alone.

Why not ban smoking too? I mean, it kills right? Why are companies still making them? Any arguement for that?

Art is art, real is real. Stop blaming art for causing real CP, it's like sueing all fighting gaming industry for making ppl violent.

Nice board

>>56
Wrong. Being raped (even if they said yes, sex with someone underage is rape) as a child almost always leaves irreversible damage, even if they liked it. Also, if they liked it they might think it's ok to do it to someone else, and odds are that they won't like it.