Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Starfox Adventures

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-01 22:51

is a sinister plot to turn our nation's children furry.

"Oh, dinosaurs! I like dinosaurs! And Starfox is cool! *game starts* Mommy, who's this sly-looking fox girl? She's not on Starfox's team! Oh, what are those round things on her chest? I didn't know foxes had those! Why is she opening her mouth and lifting up her head in quasi-orgasmic ecstasy OH SHI" (sudden explosion in the TV room, and innocent child turns into a slobbering fat 40-year-old) "fapfapfapfap"

DISCUSS

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-02 0:24

Bah. Considering video games have been rife with animal mascots since the Atari years, all it takes is the sad combination of lonliness and just the right amount of TV screen radiation, and BAM. Furry. I might even suggest that anime freak is another possible alternative, along with serial killer and computer programmer. We must ban these things. For the children.

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-02 10:51

It all goes wrong when you start rendering fur...

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-03 9:24

But M.O.M.O. is acceptable?

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-03 15:30

>>1

TRUTH

Furries = the result of watching saturday morning cartoons rather than anime at the onset of puberty.

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-03 18:08

i don't get it, there are alot of internet fetishes much worse than furry, everyone is just sucking blowtax's e-cock. SA is only mildly amusing at best.

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-04 0:25

>>4
but in xenosaga in the character design thing for momo you can see her titties... errrr, that's what my friend told me, anyway <_< >_>

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-04 10:22

>>6

 No internet fetish is worse than furry.

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-04 12:37

You haven't seen the Internet.

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-04 14:23 (sage)

>>9

There's a difference between "most pathetic fetish" and "most irritating assholes in a fetish".

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-04 18:39

>>9
"Worse" as in "causing drama whoring and sticking furry pictures in your face". I've never seen someone on a general discussion forum with, say, a dickgirl avatar.

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-05 14:10

You're just not hanging round the right forums...

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-06 20:14 (sage)

>>11
I can see your point, but a furry avatar in itself is not something offensive. If it has two furries going at it, yeah, but just some generic fox not doing anything? Cry me a fucking river.

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-07 11:32

>>13
There's a difference between cute little funny animal avatar (which might mark a furry, but I don't mind at all) and some Fist of the Northstar-like fox looking for gay buttsex.

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-21 18:54

Fighting spam, one bump at a time!

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List