Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I'm finally sick of Windows.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-18 6:35

I've decided that Microsoft wants to win the award for "Biggest Asshole" and i'd like to try another OS. I haven't had much experience with other OSs so please help me to decide which one is the best. I just want something that is incredibly capable and versatile that doesn't take me forever to figure out. Please help a noob.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-18 8:33

Linux LiveCDs are a good first stop for newbies, since you can try as many as you want and make absolutely no commitment until you've found the perfect one.

Try these for a start:
BeatrIX (http://www.watsky.net/)
Mepis (http://www.mepis.org/)
Ubuntu (http://www.ubuntu.com/)

It's worth pointing out that to get the most out of your operating system with respect to capability and versatility you will have to spend time figuring it out; however the ones I've selected above are all designed with the new user in mind, and are usable immediately by anyone who knows what a mouse is.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-19 0:47

OK so waht do i do when i think i'm ready for something more advanced?

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-19 1:16 (sage)

Open the terminal window.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-19 1:23

I'm looking for serious answers here

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-19 3:45

No you arn't. You are looking for free research, gtfo and go and use google.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-19 3:48

>>5
Welcome to the world of Linux, where nobody will answer your questions because you're not 1337 enough.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-19 6:54 (sage)

>>7

How true...

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-19 7:13

>>1
Get Gentoo, compile it from scratch using some finger-lickin' CFLAGS like -march=your_processor -m=your_processor -O3 -funroll-loops -falign-double -Wall -s to unleash the MAD POWER.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-19 8:04 (sage)

lawl

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-19 8:31

>>1
"I just want something that is incredibly capable and versatile that doesn't take me forever to figure out."

Sounds like a Mac.  Linux sure as hell doesn't fit that description.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-19 8:47

>>11
Yeah, dragging your CD drive into the trash to eject it sure is intuitive.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-19 9:42

>>11
sounds like THE FUTURE!

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-19 9:53

>>12

Eject button, Eject button lol

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-19 10:00

>>11
Sounds like you haven't got a clue about it. Better start learning  Windows 2000.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-19 20:27

fucking linux geeks fagging everything up.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-20 5:24

>>5
Welcome to the world of Linux, where nobody will answer your questions because you're not 1337 enough.


reposted because no one have yet to answer your question.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-20 6:46

[oracle]You will know when you are ready.[/oracle]

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-20 7:04

>>1
Either get a mac if you've got the dough, or put a bit of effort into learning linux. Suse and Ubuntu are a few of the easy to use distros, with GUI/automatic installation.

For all your advanced linux questions, either check out guides and how-to pages on the linux documentation project http://www.tldp.org/
or ask questions on a linux forum. http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/ is pretty good. They have a newbie section which you can search through for answers, or post your own embarassing question. People are generally pretty nice. They also have distro-specific forums for localized problems.

I personally use a mac, since I needed a laptop with good hardware, and a hassle-free interface, but linux is a perfect alternative, especially if you have a desktop already. I recommend giving one of the aforementioned distros a spin. If it doesn't work or suit your tastes, try another one. See if you like KDE or Gnome better (both are now supported by Ubuntu, by the way), and if you still think it's a bit too technical, get a mac.

A word of warning though: if you're into gaming, windows or linux with cedega is still your best bet. Despite the new macs being x86 based, I don't believe Cedega or Wine runs on them.

Good luck exploring this brave and sometimes slightly frustrating new world. In the end, it's still much more relaxing than running windows, most of the time.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-20 12:19

>>19
ZOMG!!!1111 Someone gave a sensible answer!
Stop the press, world4chan has something OTHER than trolls.

Holy shit...

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-20 12:27 (sage)

>>19
>>20
awesome

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-21 14:59

>>21
Word.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-23 1:04

Ubuntu is highly recommended for both its Debian base and release schedule. Also, most of its user base falls under the same predicament as yourself and are willing to provide support rather than a RTFM or "you obviously don't know so why bother". Now MEPIS is another route to take if you need a distribution optimized for i586 (Ubuntu only offers i386 and AMD64/EM64T).

Now as far as how to approach the learning of Linux, I'd suggest first gaining an understanding of the file hierarchy and learning how to navigate it through a terminal emulator (tty) as well as understanding UNIX permissions. Then you should become accustomed to the more useful programs provided by GNU or considered a standard such as touch, watch, ls, top, cat, etc. TuxFiles has an incomplete series of tutorials for just this, it also wouldn't hurt to get ahold of a reference book or two -- no shame in visiting the library or fetching an ebook off a fserve.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-23 1:22

>>19
WITH THE DOUGH YOU BLOW ON A MAC FOR THE WHITE PLASIC SHELL, ROUNDED EDGES AND APPLE LOGO.... YOU CAN GET DOUBLE IF NOT TRIPLE THE MACHINE HARDWARE AND RUN BSD OR LINUX

SINCE MACOS IS SIMPLY A BSD RIPOFF, THE LEAD FREBSD DEVELOPER WAS BOUGHT BY APPLE AND SEATED AS THE DARWIN PROJECT HEAD

STEVE JOBS IS A FUCKTARD JIZZWIPE

BUT YEA, APPLE LAPTOPS ARE GOOD.. HARDWARE-WISE, AND PPC IS A NICE ARCHITECTURE

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-23 22:17

>>19

As far as I know, Wine and (lol) Cedega have mac versions.

And there also windoze emulators for mac.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-24 3:32

>>25

wine/cedega on ppc mac: no

windows emulator: "virtual pc" exists, runs like total shit (divide the mac's mhz by 5..)

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-24 5:00

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-24 6:06

>>27
Those are libraries. Not wine proper.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-24 10:25

>>28

Wtf do you think wine is?

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-24 10:42

>>29
A "runtime compatibility layer". Which is certainly nothing like an emulator, nosiree!

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-24 11:20

WINE means Wine Is aN Emulator.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-24 11:29 (sage)

>>31
wrong, it means "Wine Is Not an Emulator"

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-24 12:37 (sage)

>>32

You retard.

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-24 12:50 (sage)

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-24 13:02

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-24 13:47

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-24 15:04

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-24 15:27

Name: Anonymous 2006-02-24 17:45

>>29
Man, and you call yourself a geek?

Wine usually refers to the programs and libraries that allow windows executables to run in a different OS (on x86). Darwine is a port of only the libraries, so that developers can compile windows programs on OSX. You can't take an already-built executable and run the thing. It's the wrong CPU architecture!

Now how fucking often do you think some random bozo is going to call up a developer of a windows app, and the developer will say, "I'LL GET RIGHT ON THAT!"?

It seem the Darwine project is now trying to add CPU emulation so you don't need to recompile a program, but since OSX is moving to x86 anyway, I think that's a dead idea.

Name: gave up windows, got hell 2006-02-25 7:06

man i think i just did a big mistake removing winXP and installing zenwalk... it seems to be based on slackware...
 IM CONFUSED! I CANT EVEN INSTALL NVIDIA VIDEO DRIVERS PROPERLY!
ohemgee. Apparently this was more than i could handle....

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List