Animation Appreciation Thread #3

The Sakuga Wiki [JP] - http://www18.atwiki.jp/sakuga/
ANN Database - http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/

Animation Blogs [Eng]:
http://www.pelleas.net/aniTOP/
http://aninomiyako.wordpress.com/

Animation Twitters [Eng]:
http://twitter.com/raito_kun
http://twitter.com/Duune99
http://twitter.com/kyouray
http://twitter.com/catsuka

Previous threads:
#1 http://dis.4chan.org/read/anime/1291816034
#2 http://dis.4chan.org/read/anime/1314681601

I want to move away from using the term "Sakuga" as it often alienates people and can be misleading. There has been a bit of backlash against the Sakuga movement lately, and I'd like to think many people come to this thread to talk about the animation and visual aspect of anime, which is something that often gets overlooked elsewhere. It would be nice if we could get a wider appreciation of visuals in the anime fandom without being seen as elitists.

>>865
Atsushi Itou is credited as producer on Munto TV along with Hideaki Hatta.  That should be proof enough Kadokawa was part producer along with Kyoto Animation.

Also Munto does have a manga.  And it is published by Kadokawa Shoten.

It's still too early to tell what will happen with Chuunibyou, but I don't think it's farfetched at all to assume it will receive a manga if(when) Kadokawa ends up on its production committee.

And I still don't understand your reasoning for why you think Chuunibyou will be a "waste".  Though it's starting to sound like the same old "why won't they make what I want" spiel you hear a lot whenever people talk about new KyoAni projects.