/vip/ - Are we agreed

Name: VIPPER 2010-02-07 0:38

that the mark ":3" automatically invalidates the purported claim, or even the validity of sentiment, of any post containing it, in any context?

Name: VIPPER 2010-02-07 2:16

I love kitties :3

Name: VIPPER 2010-02-07 10:18

3:3

Name: VIPPER 2010-02-07 12:39

>>1
Due to your own statement, your post is invalid.
However, if your post (the claim that any post containing said phrase in any context is invalid) is invalid, then any post containing said phrase is not invalid, making your post perfectly valid.
However, this presents problems, as we have discussed the invalidity of your statement, due to the validity of your statement.

I therefore deem your post both valid and invalid.

Name: VIPPER 2010-02-07 20:21

>>4
blind = mown

Name: VIPPER 2010-02-07 22:36

I like Konata.

Name: VIPPER 2010-02-08 7:59

══════════════════════════════════════
═╔══╦╗╔╦══╗══╔══╦╗╔╦══╦╗╔═╗══╔══╦═╦╗══
═╚╗╔╣╚╝║═╦╝══║═╦╣║║║╔═╣╚╝╔╝══║╔╗║║║║══
══║║║╔╗║═╩╗══║╔╝║╚╝║╚═╣╔╗╚╗══║╚╝║║║║══
══╚╝╚╝╚╩══╝══╚╝═╚══╩══╩╝╚═╝══╚══╩╩═╝══
══════════════════════════════════════

Are we agreed

1 Name: VIPPER 2010-02-07 0:38

2 Name: VIPPER 2010-02-07 2:16

3 Name: VIPPER 2010-02-07 10:18

4 Name: VIPPER 2010-02-07 12:39

5 Name: VIPPER 2010-02-07 20:21

6 Name: VIPPER 2010-02-07 22:36