Dr. Who, Primeval, Torchwood...

Little Britain, the list goes on...
British TV is just kicking the shit out of American TV.  But many would say that's nothing new.

Ewwww... Little Britain is the most overrated show in the history of TV. How anyone can stand more then a second of that fat faggot I don't know.

>>2
So says the only gay in the village.

Also Top Gear, QI, Jekyll, etc. Not to mention the original Life on Mars. The American version was like watching its mentally disadvantaged twin.

Oh Yeah, Jekyll was fucking great!  Don't know Life on Mars.  I'll keep an eye out.  Thanks.

Skins is just one of the best shows on tv atm

Sorry, but my shitfilter is set to high today:

Dr. Who is BBC crap that's only lovable because it's been around since when it was scary.
Primeval is shit. Have you read the title? Primeval. Read it again. Primeval. Fuck. Also, ITV.
Torchwood is, by definition of being a shit spin-off, shit, and a spin-off. Don't even get me started on how they try to cram sex into the equation so they get a different audience for being primetime.
Little Britain got annoying and repetitive, especially when Joe Public thought it was great to moronically shout `Am I bovvered?' at absolutely everything and anything.
Top Gear? More like Toff Gear, amirite? *guffaw*
QI is a glint of sunlight glistening in the stream of bat's piss that is television.
Jekyll and Life on Mars I can't comment on, although I don't think we needed yet another Jekyll & Hyde incarnation.
And Skins. So we're, like, down with the kids and shit, yeah?

More like JEWmerican TV, amirite?

>>8
monkey

>>7
You are a middle aged fat balding American piece of trailer trash, who likes nothing better than to attempt to put down all other nations, races, sexes, religions, and beliefs that are not identical to yours.

You deserve to be left to burn in a fire of your own creation, while being eaten alive by rabid rodents and pissed on by your closest associates, while watching repeats of Dr Who, Primeval, Torchwood, Little Britain, Top Gear, Life On Mars, and Skins. ..and possibly Jekyll on a 45" Widescreen Flatpanel TV with surround sound.

You are a disgrace to society, and you contribute nothing to your community or nation as a whole. You are a leech, and a spot on the backside of the American nation, and you deserve whatever misfortune befalls you.

http://dick-as-a-name.mybrute.com

>>10
holy shit

>>10
HEY!  OP here, and I beg your pardon, but I'm a middle aged fat balding American piece of trailer trash.  Well, maybe not balding.  Or trailer trash.  Though when you hit middle age you do thin out on top.  Though you make up for it on your back, and in your ears and nose. And not full on trailer trash, but definitely not rich.
Not really fat either, but I could stand to lose a few...

>>10
Almost any wild or domestic animal can potentially get rabies, but it is very rare in small rodents (rats, squirrels, chipmunks) and lagomorphs (rabbits and hares). Large rodents (beavers, woodchucks/groundhogs) have been found to have rabies in some areas of the United States.

>>10
Now that was VIP QUALITY

>>14
large rodents

>>16
Are you trying to make a point?  Are you under the impression that I did not read my own post?  Is your mindset so adversarial that you can not simply take a piece of information as such without believing it to be an attack?  This is an attack:  YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON

>>17
No-one provides a piece of information, if it is not going to contribute constructively to the conversation, unless they are mentally handicapped.
What would have driven you to go and find information on rabid rodents, other than to counteract what I had said. No further addition was needed, and if, like you imply, your post was merely informative, then it failed on a hundred different levels, as the information contained within it was completely irrelevant to the discussion, given the context it was used in.

In future, try to cover your failures and denial a tad better, as it allows the more intelligent and mentally alert members of this board to pick you apart, bit by bit.

You are, I'm afraid to have to say, an idiot, and should toddle back off to /b/, where you inevitably came from, to frolic in the field of crusted manure that is the Random discussion board.

>>18
i came

>>18
i came

>>19
>>20
wtf

>>19
>>20
>>21

back to /b/ please

>>18
Wow.  You are pathological.  I'll bet you're on medication.  Mentally alert?  That's funny, if pathetic.  Now you should "toddle" off to bed, and in the morning tell mommy that you need to see your "Doctor" to have your meds adjusted.

>>23
Maybe if you keep digging, you'll dig your way out the other side.

dig dig dig

hay i founds sum jewgold

>>24
I was gonna ignore you're sick ass, but I'm bored...

No-one provides a piece of information, if it is not going to contribute constructively to the conversation, unless they are mentally handicapped.

You believe your post >>10 or any of your stupid nasty little fart like posts are in any way constructive?  My post actually provided some dignity to yours, which you have negated through your contentiousness and inability to read.  Let's read together now

What would have driven you to go and find information on rabid rodents, other than to counteract what I had said.

Well, clearly, as you so clumsily pointed out, the information did not "counteract" what you had said, so an intelligent person must assume that I had an "other" reason.  This is where it will get tricky for you:  I didn't "go out and find information", I was aware of the interesting(to me and many others)fact that rabies is quite rare in rodents.  You opened the door and made rabid rodentia relevant, so in an effort to move slowly away from your rather ordinary and simpleminded obloquy, I posted the quote. This is tricky for you to understand because you are a troll.  Whether it's deliberate or not, the fact is you damage this board, and very likely everything and everyone around you with your anger and self loathing.  You really do need professional help.  Normal people really don't think like you.  Pick me apart?  The only things you pick at effectively are your asshole, your nose, and your acne.
By the way, your use of the word "inevitably" was a poor choice.    
Dig that, you arrogant, half-witted, narcissistic little troll.

>>27

I was trying to have an intelligent discussion, but It looks like all I've ended up with is arguing with some half-witted hilbilly who thinks that being able to use Google counts as knowledge.

If I wanted to argue with you and insult you, like you seem so keen to do to me, you would have killed yourself by now out of sheer embarrassment and despair. But no, I was trying to have an intelligent discussion with someone I initially thought was intelligent themselves.

Looks like I've ended up running into another pre-pubescent teenager with a lot of ego, but very little sense.

Now do me and everyone else a favour, and go back to /b/ please .

Your kind are not welcome here.

>>28
differentfag and/or fail

I found out I'm an unintentional Anglophile - I end up liking a lot of British bands, TV, and movies.  That's at least partially because the best stuff filters out and makes it over here.  Personally, I like the general British sense of humor and their accents.

The shows are pretty decent.  They definitely have that British look as opposed to Hollywood overproduction.  I think our expectations play a role too - we expect more or at least something different from American shows.

Netflix has lots of good stuff.

Am I bovverrrred was actually from The Catherine Tate show. Not little Britain.

http://dick-as-a-name.mybrute.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skZiKA2k3M4" target='_blank'>http://href.li/?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skZiKA2k3M4