"After the jump"

When I see either of those phrases in random articles on places like wired or engadget it makes me want to punch the cunt that wrote them in the face.

It may make sense in printed media, where articles can be broke up by pages of adverts, but it makes fuck all sense on a webpage.

The whole idea supposes that people aren't familiar with what a fucking hyperlink is, or that the act of clicking one is some kind of awesome web2.0 internet experience that the cunts feel the need to prompt us to CLICK A FUCKING LINK.I want to cut off your hands so I never have to see that fucking abomination on my screen again.

Am I overreacting or does anyone else find it annoying as shit?

You're overreacting.

Pisses me off. Then again everything does.

Anyone who actually reads "Wired" magazine can't make a valid claim against the formatting.  It's a mess of distractions and entertainments and soundbites.  Read a REAL magazine like the Economist.

>>4
I only look at it online and I sort of hate it, its so low on actual content and they think they're on the fucking bleeding edge of hip technology or something. I should stop going there its just pissing me off...

Thats why I stopped my Wired subscription of nearly 10 years 6 years ago.

Full of fail and AIDS now.