>>4
What is wrong with you, man? Drive spins faster, drive can access data faster. 1.5Gbps is the theoretical transfer rate of the SATA connection; you will not ever get that much from any drive currently available.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-15 23:23
OOO so thats theorectical transfer speed thats what i thoguht the actual was. so yes the 7200 would be the better choice. Any word about what the actual would be and the actual difference betwen the two would be?
>>7
I could be utterly, tragically wrong, but I would think that the larger benefit from increased RPM is in seek time, followed by transfer rate. If you want to know this for a particular drive, just benchmark it or use fucking Google.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-16 0:25
>>9
It depends on the file size, small files benefit more from the seek time, while large files benefit from the transfer rate.
There is no need to buy a slow 5400rpm drive anymore. It's old technology.
Also, the transfer rate of 1.5GB/s or 3.0GB/s (SATA and SATAII, respectively) is a misnomer. No drive can actually throw that much data out at once. It's just the CONNECTION that can SUPPORT that amount of data. It's like using a 8mbps internet connection on a NIC that supports 10/100/1000. That internet connection won't go that fast.
Understand?
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-21 0:49
Use an ATA 33/66 cable like me and you're all set.