>>8
What is it that you don't understand?
>>4 is right, and
>>5 is wrong in both contradicting the general statement and for applying misinformation so broadly.
The only situation where
>>5's assessment of 16:9 content on a 4:3 screen is correct is on displays with overscan. But then, such displays can come in any aspect ratio and display technology and will typically apply that overscan to content of any dimensions.
Not enough display-tards here to know that they don't know enough, I guess. I can only hope that you guys are here to learn something and aren't just trolling to justify your own purchases.