Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Ethical dilemmas

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-21 19:34


>Difficult ethics questions.
Answer with "[+]"
or #[-]

____
[Murderer]
 1. A runaway boxcar is about to run over

five people walking on the tracks. A

railroad worker is standing next to a

switch that can turn the boxcar onto a side

track, killing one person, but allowing the

five to survive. Flipping the switch is

______.

[Harvester]
2. Five people have just been rushed into a

hospital in critical condition, each

requiring an organ to survive. There is not

enough time to request organs from outside

the hospital, but there is a healthy person

in the hospital's waiting room. If the

surgeon takes this person's organs, he will

die, but the five in critical care will

survive. Taking the healthy person's organs

is _______.

[Patriot]
3. A runaway boxcar is about to run over

five foreign people trapped on the tracks.

A railroad worker is standing next to a

switch that can turn the boxcar onto a side

track, killing one person you know and love

that is tied to the tracks, but allows the

five foreigners to survive. Flipping the

switch is ______.

[Hero]
4. You are one of the potential victims of

one of these three scenarios above but you

carry a means of stopping them in advance

but it causes their death. Would you want

to know who is reponsible for moving you

into harm's way so that you could save

yourself?
______.

[God]
5. You are a deity and you forget who is
good and who is bad. Do you still have
a hell for them if it means that someone
innocent will end up there wrongfully?
______.

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-27 1:51

Assuming:
+ -> good/right
- -> bad/wrong

1. - It is not the railroad workers right to sacrifice the one to save the others. He violates the one's right to life by flipping it but does not violate the others rights to life by not flipping it.
2. - Same.
3. - The person with the organs has a right to them. Taking them would violate that right. The others do not have rights violated when you do not kill one to save them.
4. That is very awkwardly phrased. Doesn't really ask a question.
5. Also awkwardly phrased. Do I keep a hell even if I might accidentally send good people there? Of course not. But I wouldn't keep a hell in the first place. Everyone would get the same treatment, and it would be set up so their own sins cause their problems.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List