Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Oxytocin hormone connection with Xenophobia

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-24 1:28

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t789039/

Anti-racism, anti-xenophobia and racial mixing = against nature

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKYPQNU6g9w

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-25 4:45

>>1
If it was against nature, it wouldn't exist you dumb shit.

You can't go against nature, because if you do, well that's part of nature too.

At first I thought the title was Oxycontin, which makes sense considering the trash who get addicted to it.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-25 18:13

Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism

    Carsten K. W. De Dreu1,
    Lindred L. Greer,
    Gerben A. Van Kleef,
    Shaul Shalvi, and
    Michel J. J. Handgraaf

+ Author Affiliations

    Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Edited by Douglas S. Massey, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved December 21, 2010 (received for review October 12, 2010)

Abstract

Human ethnocentrism—the tendency to view one's group as centrally important and superior to other groups—creates intergroup bias that fuels prejudice, xenophobia, and intergroup violence. Grounded in the idea that ethnocentrism also facilitates within-group trust, cooperation, and coordination, we conjecture that ethnocentrism may be modulated by brain oxytocin, a peptide shown to promote cooperation among in-group members. In double-blind, placebo-controlled designs, males self-administered oxytocin or placebo and privately performed computer-guided tasks to gauge different manifestations of ethnocentric in-group favoritism as well as out-group derogation. Experiments 1 and 2 used the Implicit Association Test to assess in-group favoritism and out-group derogation. Experiment 3 used the infrahumanization task to assess the extent to which humans ascribe secondary, uniquely human emotions to their in-group and to an out-group. Experiments 4 and 5 confronted participants with the option to save the life of a larger collective by sacrificing one individual, nominated as in-group or as out-group. Results show that oxytocin creates intergroup bias because oxytocin motivates in-group favoritism and, to a lesser extent, out-group derogation. These findings call into question the view of oxytocin as an indiscriminate “love drug” or “cuddle chemical” and suggest that oxytocin has a role in the emergence of intergroup conflict and violence.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-25 18:15

    Abstract

    Human ethnocentrism—the tendency to view one's group as centrally important and superior to other groups—creates intergroup bias that fuels prejudice, xenophobia, and intergroup violence. Grounded in the idea that ethnocentrism also facilitates within-group trust, cooperation, and coordination, we conjecture that ethnocentrism may be modulated by brain oxytocin, a peptide shown to promote cooperation among in-group members. In double-blind, placebo-controlled designs, males self-administered oxytocin or placebo and privately performed computer-guided tasks to gauge different manifestations of ethnocentric in-group favoritism as well as out-group derogation. Experiments 1 and 2 used the Implicit Association Test to assess in-group favoritism and out-group derogation. Experiment 3 used the infrahumanization task to assess the extent to which humans ascribe secondary, uniquely human emotions to their in-group and to an out-group. Experiments 4 and 5 confronted participants with the option to save the life of a larger collective by sacrificing one individual, nominated as in-group or as out-group. Results show that oxytocin creates intergroup bias because oxytocin motivates in-group favoritism and, to a lesser extent, out-group derogation. These findings call into question the view of oxytocin as an indiscriminate “love drug” or “cuddle chemical” and suggest that oxytocin has a role in the emergence of intergroup conflict and violence.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-25 18:24

>>2
By being against "nature" it simply means it is against ones natural internal inclinations to preserve specific alleles, gained from natural selection.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-25 22:44

>>5
So what?  Douchebags keep acting like natural or not natural means anything regarding goodness.  I blame the hippies.  Way to go stormfront; you think like ignorant hippies.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-26 0:59

>>6
You can go against ones natural inclinations in life and if you end up dead, maybe after that you can tell me if 'that' is good or not.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-26 10:25

I dunno, in my extensive experience it seems less like a need to see one's group as superior and more like a need to see one's group as significant in a non relative manner. 

The need for superiority seems to be psychological projection: It comes about as a reaction to the implication that your group is inferior.

Name: Anonymous 2011-03-26 19:19

>>8
How many hits did your research have?

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 1:37

>>7
Don't be a retard.  Lots of bad shit is natural.  Lots of behaviour that makes life shittier for people is natural.  Develop a moral sense, shithead.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 1:39

>>1
Do you realise that you linked to Stormfront?  lol

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-01 21:23

>>10
Are you seriously claiming that a "moral sense" is something that actually exists and isn't just an imagined culturally evolved set of abstract rules? You can't develop indoctrination, moron.
Which in case you don't understand what that means, it's when your mother scolded you for breaking her vase, even though it doesn't actually fucking matter at all that you broke the vase.
Just as it doesn't matter at all if you killed a cat or something.

You don't hit 23 and go "OH NO KILLING CATS AND BREAKING VASES IS BAD", you get told that by most people you meet, and unless, like some people that have that thing you don't(testosterone), you just, you know, IGNORE THEM, then you start believing it and being a faggot yourself.

I thought I was on /sci/ not /psy/, what is all this bullshit?

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-15 7:20

>>11
You do realize that you haven't debunked it one bit.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-15 9:33

What a bunch of fucking simpleton degenerates you people are to read something like this and assume confidently that you immediately know the answer. The world is complicated and we are all more biased than we admit to ourselves--try to enlighten yourself.

Let see:

This research comes from the netherlands, a country that in the last decade has become known for the prevalence of white-supremacist sentiments among its population, a product of the high ratio of non-white immigrants/to native dutch citizens. Thus, the research was conducted on a population of people that are atypically predisposed towards identifying their ingroup along racial lines. If they were not so, it is very possible that results of this study would have been different--See http://www.pnas.org/content/98/26/15387.short for an explanation.

More importantly, two facts are already known: 1)people have racist tendencies 2)people's behavior and 'sentiments' come from the brain. So, to find something correlating the two is unimpressive. Of course, some neonazis have gone and tried to say that this proves that racism is hardwired into the brain and into our perception of ingroups and outgroups. But that is not at all proven by the study.

Most importantly, despite the fact that racism is probly hardwired to some degree--albeit likely in a way that is less profound or binding than the degenerates would have you believe--the point is that most enlightened people would like to overcome racism. We live in an increasingly globalized world of scarce resources, where the large majority of people of all ethnicities stand to gain more (in wealth, security, technology etc.) from cooperation and friendly competition than they do from the destructive competition of racism.

Personally though, sometimes I really just think that the degenerate fuckwad neanderthals who can't overcome their base human urges (ie racists) should be treated like the animals they are and stripped of their membership in society. But that would be unproductive, like racism.

Seriously though: http://www.pnas.org/content/98/26/15387.short use your fucking head. For once.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-16 5:54

bump

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-16 5:55

.....buuuummmppp

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-16 17:38

>>14
the netherlands, a country that in the last decade has become known for the prevalence of white-supremacist sentiments among its population,

NOPE.jpg

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-16 19:23

Just because one is a "racist" does not mean one is also a supremacist.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-16 16:04

Well, my answer to your question would be "who cares?" Who cares what anyone has to say. It is your life, and your decision.. They are not the ones living through what you are so don't worry about what they think. I am a caucasian woman, and my fiancee' is from Rwanda, Africa, and I happen to be 33 weeks pregnant with our son. I have never had any problems with anyone saying anything, and if they have anything to say they can keep it to themselves. Be happy you're going to be a mommy!! :)

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-17 14:34

>>13
There's nothing to debunk.  You expect us to take your shit seriously when you use a KKK derivation as a place to find such information?  Good luck.

Name: Anonymous 2011-05-17 14:40

>>12
Don't be stupid.  Not only do you have zero appreciation of evolutionarily adaptive behaviour for social animals, you call someone a "faggot".  Apparently your parents didn't slap your ass enough for you to develop manners, let alone a moral sense that you believe must be sourced from fear of personal injury.  Only sociopaths require the fear of the supernatural or earthly punishment to behave well in society.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List