Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

To the ignorant

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-11 14:37

Global warming is causing viral diseases such as bird flu, west nile virus, and SARS. Our burning of fossil fuels and creation of greenhouse gasses is raising the temperature of the seas and species such as krill are dying, and many species further of the food chain cannot find food. Their weakened immune systems transform their bodies into breeding grounds for pathogenic organisms. Additionally, drought weather caused by global warming keeps bark beetles alive throughout most of the year, during which time they cause the destruction of forests on an UNPRECIDENTED scale. Before long, those who deny global warming will be coughing up bits of their stomach lining and fleas burrow into their skin. We are living on the dawn of a new black plague my friends.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-11 14:48

>>1
why are you posting troll bait

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-11 14:50

derp

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-11 14:54

So global warming is, in fact, restoring the natural proliferation of bacteria and disease that would otherwise be killing humans and animals had humans not attempted to undermine its natural affects? moreover, it's restoring species that have flourished due to human select-farming of specific species of marine life, at the cost of other species, to sustainable population levels?

I see no problem with this correction.  Proceed with the blood-spitting coughs any time you're ready, Gaia.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-11 17:27

>>4
I don't think your comprehensive reading skills are as good as you think they are.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-13 3:26

>>1
"Global warming is causing viral diseases such as bird flu, west nile virus, and SARS"

Global warming does not cause these things. It allows for them to exist predominantly.

Please provide substantial evidence besides your initial premise for the conclusion, "Their weakened immune systems transform their bodies into breeding grounds for pathogenic organisms."

If I had to make a personal observation it would be this, "Your statements are inflammatory, non sequitur, and blatantly lack any personally vested research nor time to fully explain your case. You are repeating what you heard which is why it appears to everyone else as "70% complete" information.

1) Bacteria and virii flourish because of the acidity within the body. Acid levels are prime breeding grounds for them. So lack of food causes a buildup of body acid which is called metabolic acidosis or because of increased carbon dioxide in the water (which I don't even know is possible or not) can cause respiratory acidosis because the carbon dioxide can't be expelled fast enough. YET, all I can say is that this is true for humans...as for marine biology, I'm not familiar.

seriously, I'm with >>5 on this one, >>4 is ludicrous. When you make a statement, don't use a contradiction as the premise.

Personally, I'm undecided on the issues at this moment for lack of evidence. Sorry.

Honestly, would you listen to someone on /sci/ make a conclusion about a scientific topic and merely take it at face value or would you take what you've just read and seek the truth and fiction from what information is provided; especially coming from someone whom you don't even know is a marine and/or micro biologist and/or a meteorologist.

So, who would you ask first about the information OP posted? A marine biologist, a micro biologist, and a meteorologist. And would you stop at just one scientist? Why not two? Why not three? Why not best of 10?!? If you are directing your questions you can point to specific areas that the scientist WOULD know as opposed to just guessing. But think about it this way, your questions add to their curiosity for their personal areas of interest!!! So, by asking questions, you help them find answers where they might not have otherwise thought to look. By opening your mind, you open theirs as well. Questions are the key to an open mind. Answers solve questions so others may be asked.

:/

So, trust in a     agitated, disorganized, excited, mixed up, upset poster's statement? Objectively, use his statement as a tool. Assume he is right (axiom) until you objectively prove otherwise (burden of proof). That is science. Why? Because what is stated remains standing until proof tears it down. Your hating or disgust of a statement does not tear it down, those feelings tear YOU down.

:/

also, you are mostly 12yo children hoping for the worst and expecting perfection...no wonder you have deep-seated depression and anxiety.

:/

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-13 10:57

>>6
Making a blatant contradictory statement in a premise that misinterprets the original argument is a perfect means of demonstrating how little regard you have for the original argument.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-14 3:36

>>7
non-sequitur...the ignorant masses means of confabulating themselves and those around them into more of the same.

...NOT ON MY WATCH!

:/

Name: dvd 2010-05-14 16:08

>http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/05/climate-change-causing-lizards-t.html

That type of news can scare even biologist like 'us'

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-15 4:47

hmm :/

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-21 18:07

Global warming = tropical globe miriteeeee

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-24 19:14

IGNORANT MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-26 5:17

>>12
hold one just one second, kodak!
Is that where you get all your intel?

XD BAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

:/

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-26 22:49

>>12
"My anus says you is ignant. My anus is neva rong."

is what you are trying to tell us, amirite?

:/

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List