String theory for dummies

http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/string-theory-for-dummies-cheat-sheet.html#ixzz0lMT2HoUm

Baseless conjecture does not belong here. Take it to /x/.

>>2
explain why it's conjecture

>>3
Because there is no evidence for it (yet)

/x/ stuff cannot be proven mathematically.

>>3
Because the Scientific Method is a ruthless bitch, that's why. Google that cunt, nigger.

The various string "theories" are not actually theories in the scientific sense of the word. They are not even valid hypotheses. It isn't science. Period.

"String theorists" are basically trying to do science backwards. They are more like a religious cult than scientists.

>>6
No, but they are more mathematicians than physicists, I guess.

>>6
>>&
They are more mathematicians than physicists, however its also true that some of them are too taken with the metaphysical implications are are possessed with some dread certainty that definitely pulls a little cultish.

>>8
I certainly wouldn't call it cultish.
It would be stupid not to explore the theory to its full extent. I'm sure string theorists more than anyone would want to see evidence of it being false, so they can move on.