Nature is already inherently bisexual, so the proposition of one over the other is a matter of personal preference and therefore a choice made within free-will.
The only thing that homosexuality goes against is the concept of yin and yang. There would be two yangs or two yins. Both would always appear stable, but internally they would be highly unstable. This is why there are gay awareness parades...the attempted alleviation of sexual anxieties and insecurities.
And as for it being wrong for other people besides myself to do? Nope! It's just not my cup of tea...I prefer a bottle of Jack, a fir burger and a side order of tits to go, please!
>:3
Name:
Anonymous2010-03-09 18:15
Nature is already inherently bisexual, so the proposition of one over the other is a matter of personal preference and therefore a choice made within free-will.
The only thing that homosexuality goes against is the concept of yin and yang. There would be two yangs or two yins. Both would always appear stable, but internally they would be highly unstable. This is why there are gay pride parades...the attempted alleviation of sexual anxieties and insecurities by placing gays on a pedestal. How could I do what's right for me if other people don't do what's right for them?
:/
And as for it being wrong for other people besides myself to do? Nope! It's just not my cup of tea...I prefer a bottle of Jack, a fir burger and a side order of tits to go, please!
>:3
Name:
Anonymous2010-03-14 19:47
A bit of both. Some are homosexuals from birth. Note exceptions don't make the rules. Others can become homosexuals if sexually abused.
However it surely is not as natural as some loud dyke wants it to be. There is no benefit from homosexuality.
I believe homosexuality is a choice, or at least a semi-choice. Both sociology and psychology work with relations between people as a internal relations between the self and the percieved version of the other. In other words, the self chooses how it sees other people and, in the end, who are attractive or not.
Name:
Anonymous2010-03-17 13:38
>>9
It's a choice, always a choice, everything is choice, anything that happens did so because of choice and could not have happened without it.
They are all an queers! They cannot make children! So it is not normal!
Name:
Anonymous2010-03-17 19:51
>>11
they can make children, with a little assist from genetic engineers...now it is normal because it's become the norm...but then again, what is normal to someone who doesn't go outside their house?
It's a choice. It's against nature. Nobody gives a fuck.
Name:
Anonymous2010-03-19 1:45
>>13
Genetic engineering does not go against nature, it utilizes the fundamentals OF nature applied through human choice which is a creature of nature, therefore it is natural via proxy.
what is trolling to a troll, sir?
If there was no affect, there should have been no response, amirite?
Also, not your personal army, gain courages, become an hero.
>>15
No sir! It is against the laws of nature since it was not done as nature intended! You can't twist the way nature works!
Name:
Anonymous2010-03-25 18:25
I don't necessarily see how it is 100% choice. Yes, they CHOOSE to come out of the closet but they have sexual feelings for their own sex which starts in their own brain but not necessarily by their own choice. Some gays decide to stay in the closet and try to make sure that those feelings never come out, that's their choice but they're still homosexual no matter how much they hide try and hide it. If a guy can get a boner for another guy, then it is natural. They don't DECIDE they'll just start getting boners for guys. Christian/Republifags gtfo, your thoughts and beliefs cloud the true nature of....well, nature.
>:(
Name:
Anonymous2010-04-07 21:10
>>16
implying that human choices are not natural yet humans are a part of nature. Okay, I'm with you so far.
>>17
People are not their thoughts, choice is the commitment to the path they decide, not thoughts. Even if I was strongly attracted to men, I could still choose women, especially because I'm not attracted to them, thereby gaining courage and sexually desired orgasm at the same time which I wouldn't from men cause I would be attracted to them already. You can either indulge in desire and fear or resist them. Your choice.
I could think about having sex with women the rest of my life, but until I make the choice to pursue a woman and actually have intercourse, am I still a committed heterosexual? How can I make such a claim, it would be a matter of faith at this point and not experiential proof of heterosexuality.
Hence...choice.
Even if that person doesn't believe in choice, a choice to not believe in choice was made. Without choice, no action takes place.
>>29
Man used the resources of nature to make those things!
Name:
Anonymous2010-04-27 8:45
Genetic, X chromosome linked, go read some science journals. Homosexuallity is prevelant in the animal kingdom there are even some gay lions!
Name:
Anonymous2010-05-05 21:41
>>16
...I'm sorry if you disagree with me, but as a matter of fact...yes we can BEND and even BREAK how nature works. Humans ARE a part of nature, using their NATURE to bring about NATURE.
Besides, if you are insecure about gayness, perhaps you've yet to become secure in your sexuality? :/
perhaps the truth behind your insecurity IS your nature. :/
>>36
I can insure you that I am no queer! Now, get lost!
Name:
Anonymous2010-05-07 18:47
>>37
So what you're telling me is you'd like to retire from this queer business.
:/
Name:
Anonymous2010-05-07 23:28
I think it not really either. Just fucking nasty.
Name:
Anonymous2010-05-08 3:06
>>39
that's too bad...any sexual experience is still experience. You're depriving yourself if you think like that...those thoughts are contagious and spread to all other areas of your life, don'tcha know?