Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Meteorite Impact

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-29 13:06

So do we have the capability and strategy to prevent a catastrophic meteorite impact yet? I don't really believe that drilling a hole and putting a nuke in it is an actual viable strategy.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-29 13:55

No its not as all the debris is worse than one single meteor.

Name: Anonymous 2010-01-29 18:15

>>2
We're not trying to blow it up, we just want to alter the course. As long as the main body misses us, a little debris is is perfectly tolerable.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-01 0:11

Deflecting objects is actually very easy with current technology. Theoretically, anyway. The problem is SEEING those objects before it is too late.

Last November, there was a Near Earth Object (NEO) 7 meters in diameter that passed us at a distance of about 2 Earth radii. We only noticed it 15 hours before it missed.

Now, granted, an object that small would not do much damage unless it was traveling very very fast. At the speed it was moving, it would likely have disintegrated in the upper atmosphere. And as the article points out, "on average, objects the size of 2009 VA pass this close about twice per year and impact Earth about once every 5 years."

But the point is that larger objects are not a whole lot easier to see... especially if we're not even looking for them. As it stands right now, we're only looking at very small sections of the sky, the places where we are most likely to see something interesting.

http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/11/10/1810213/Unknown-7m-Asteroid-Almost-Impacted-Earth

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-02 1:16

How big would a meteor need to be to decimate 50% of Earth's infrastructure?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-02 8:20

>>5
Depends where it hits since infrastructure is not equally distributed across the surface of the earth. Also "decimate" and "infrastructure" are poorly defined.

We could be looking at a small meteor that sends dust into the atmosphere causing cooling and a reduction in crop yields and general havoc equal to a 50% reduction in the efficiency of our infrastructure or the actual destruction of the earth's surface regardless of other consequences.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-02 22:54

>>5
Approximately big enough to destroy 5% of Earth's infrastructure.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-09 5:04

when meteors impact into water containing basic elements; guess what is discovered.

Basic Amino Acids

:/

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 4:27

>>8
Why do you always use that ":/" emoticon?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-11 12:48

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-12 1:33

>>9
for the lulz. :/

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-12 2:46

>>11
lulz
Back to /b/, please.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-12 17:22

>>12
those kids don't even know the phrase anymore. :/

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-13 3:16

>>13
Well, you can help re-introduce it to them by going back there.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-15 5:00

>>14
after you. :/

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-16 3:07

>>15
No thanks. More fun for you.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-16 5:17

>>16
Thanks for the invite. :/

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-16 8:22

>>17
No problem.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-17 5:47

>>18
next time I'll bring the beer. :/

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-17 16:49

>>19
Sure thing.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-18 12:29

>>20
No sweat.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-18 12:35

>>21
Don't worry.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-18 12:38

>>22
It's cool.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-20 13:59

just put an ion engine on it and push it away

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 19:17

>>24
how about you deflect it with your body? In the zero-gravity of space, the mass of the meteorite and your body will be similar and you should be able to deflect it easily without much effort.

:/

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-21 22:46

>>25
By that logic, we could just launch a pebble at it and have nothing to worry about.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-22 15:33

>>26
no...I didn't say a pebble, I said your body. Trust me, it'll work and you can be the savior of the entire human race! :3

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-22 20:10

>>27
you're wrong. even in the depths of space the meteorite/asteroid would have a much higher weight than you. regardless of where you are in the universe, you have some weight, and furthermore, if it were traveling fast enough to be a concern, you wouldn't be able to exert enough force to stop it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-23 3:48

>>28
weight is only measured because of gravity in relation to an external body...not the meteor itself. I believe you are referring to its mass, amirite?

Mass doesn't matter in space, just place your body right in front of it and use that corpulent abdomen of yours to deflect it. Trust me, it'll work. I mean, have you ever tried it yourself to be certain? Surely, your weight here on earth is a blessing cause it can deflect meteorites and asteroids. In the end, it's us who'll be grateful for your contribution.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-23 3:49

>>29
trust me, doing this won't just give you courage, but you'll become an hero. :3

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-23 9:26

>>28
>>29

Momentum is key here.

The momentum of the asteroid would be considerably larger than that of the 'body'. Think of putting a cat infront of a freight train.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-23 15:05

>>31
the asteroid or meteorite isn't on earth...earth's gravity or any other gravity is pretty much minuscule. Also, there is no wind resistance in space, and also no cats or freight trains.

We're talking about saving the human race here, folks! Float right up and place your rotund bodies in front of an asteroid or meteorite today and you too can become an hero for the human race to look up to.

Gain Courages / Become An Hero
If you act today, you also get a complimentary t-shirt that reads, "Wish you were here."

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-23 17:16

>>32
an hero
Back to /b/, please

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-24 2:03

>>33
Lead the way. :3

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List