There are no atheists.

Prove a vacuum of God, a lack of God. Atheism is as much a word as there can be a vacuous lack of God. Where is the hole where God should be? I get it that God exists as an idea, just like unicorns. However, the existence of atheists is that being deniers of a concept that has no basis in reality.
Here's where I get to the point. Atheists have the same concept of God that Christians have. When someone says "God" similar thoughts go through the christians head as go through the atheists. When it comes to the concept, both people, due to culture and language, think the same thing. Atheists cannot in any meaningful way lack God.
they are defined by a lack of belief in God, and since they understand the same concept as Christians when somebody says "God" they actually don't deny the existence of God.

There are no atheists.

ok so what has this got to do with science and math?

>>1
Schrodinger's Cat

also, >>2.
Schrodinger's Cat
Explains the existence of at least two possibilities in any unknown or uncertain perception; while only one true possibility is true.

1) xP=E+UR
where;
x is variable
P is possibility
E is Event
UR is Unknown or uncertain reality or outcome
-or-
2) P=E-PR
where;
P is possibility
E is Event
PR is perceivable reality or outcome

The question is, "What is the underlying value of either equation?
1) accepts the existence of an unknown with multiple possible outcomes or realities
2) denies any definitive possible outcome as of the moment without having perceived the outcome or reality; but purports the existence of only one true possible reality or outcome WILL exist.

1) Is grateful for what IS; grateful for what IS YET to occur
2) Is grateful for what IS YET to occur; ungrateful for what IS

>>1, is trying to extinguish the necessity of possibilities for the moment saying there WILL BE only one outcome; yet as of THIS moment in time multiple possibilities exist when there are experiential unknowns involved.
This is why all racists, misogynists, and misanthropists are consistently putting themselves down along with spreading same to others and getting more of the same in return. It's an unending cycle of habitual repetition.
The only absolute in this moment is; we don't know.
If you perceive a tree today, go to bed, the tree is cut down while you are asleep...is the tree still standing until you perceive it again? The answer is yes.
The disconnect is that we as a human species are finding it difficult to cope with change outside of our memory yet our memory doesn't change until we confirm it experientially. The fix for this bug is assumption of possibilities that ALL exist at the same time until unknown becomes known. Otherwise; you get a blue-screen of death and have to re-boot.
Get your bug_fix.exe today. :3

The continuity of this phenomenon deals with the re-mapping over what WAS known with what IS experienced. If the possibility is assumed that this phenomenon IS occurring and WILL recur for the rest of existence then this phenomenon can then BE known and will cease to be an issue of lack of knowledge.
Ever played the "knowing game" as a kid?

And how about the "blame game?"

Did we as children ever truly give up these games?
What are we if we are still playing them....I wonder?

:3

gb2 /x/

>>5
^* Go back to /x/