They make sunglasses that have a mirror coating on part of the inside of the lenses so you can actually see behind you.
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-29 17:47
You really wouldn't need more eyes. You'd just need to change the positions of the eyes. Put them on the side of the head, like a horse or a rabbit, and you'd be able to see 360 degrees
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-30 20:36
ANDERSON COOPER IS A RABBIT
Name:
Anonymous2009-09-30 22:04
>>6
I'm pretty sure you would still need one or two more eyes to get a full range of vision, not just 360 degrees of peripheral vision.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-01 14:10
>>3
Funny that actually made me think! A full 360° field of vision would be a shitload of information to process. And it wouldn't really help unless our bodies were symmetrical from front to back also.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-01 14:34
>>9
I don't think your body NEEDS to be radially symmetrical to derive advantages from 360 vision.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-03 0:02
Potato Head Bobby was a friend of mine.
He opened three of his eyes in the food stamp line.
He opened four of his eyes in the food stamp line.
He opened five of his eyes in the food stamp line.
He opened six of his eyes in the food stamp line.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-03 10:22
>>10
I guess not. But spiders are more or less radially symmetrical... Then again frogs and lizards aren't. But they don't really see a full 360° all the time. Only when they point their eyes a certain way. Our body shapes and movements wouldn't really be able to take advantage of it was my main point.