EMR waves necessitate Ether???

How can light in its capacity to be wavelike, propagate through space without a medium of some sort? I mean, in a longitudinal wave, such as sound, the source will cause particles in the air to collide with one another, which will create a region of relative density, and this region of relative density happens to cause an interaction between air particles (essentially the medium) as the wave propagates through the air such that the next region is rareified, and then dense, rare, etc. And the means by which the information is transferred that enables this pattern of air through the path of propagation are the air particles, which are the medium by which the wave transfers. Now, I understand light is particulate as well, which means perhaps such waves contain their own particles, which cause self-propagation even in a vacuum, i dunno for sure. I want to know how this works and how information is transferred through electromagnetic radiation that causes a wave pattern?

we don't know what anything is, at best we come up with what we call models of reality, so we say shit like "uhhh it's a field" as if that was anything familiar

Excitation of the EM field.  Lrn2 QFT.

The concept of an aether isn't new and has been in and out of scientific fashion repeatedly over the centuries. It has taken many vague forms, but you may be surprised that you are correct: there is actually a sort of aether that permeates all of Space.

The modern concept of an aether, though, is far more concrete than previous iterations, though when I name it, you may at first think otherwise.

The modern aether is called Probability.

Photons, electrons, and other sub-atomic particles exist only as peaks in a radiating probability wave. It's a topic that requires a basic understanding of modern physics and quantum mechanics to really begin to grasp.

For a better introduction than I can hope to provide without wasting an hour or two typing, see Brian Greene's book, "The Fabric of the Cosmos", which I really do suggest reading as a first step rather than, say, trying to Wikipedia the topic blindly (you'll only end up confusing yourself more, trust me).

Oh, and >>2 is an idiot.

On December 30th, 1940 Wilhelm Reich wrote to Albert Einstein in Princeton suggesting that he had an important scientific discovery to discuss. On January 13, 1941, Reich visited Einstein in Princeton. They talked for 5 hours, and Einstein agreed to test the apparatus that Reich would supply, an "orgone accumulator", a box made up of a Faraday cage (galvanized steel) insulated by wood and paper on the outside. Einstein performed the experiment which involved taking the temperatures atop and near the device. Einstein also stripped the device down to its Faraday cage. In both cases, Einstein observed a positive temperature difference for a week in his study, and confirmed Reich's finding in a published letter. Einstein originally agreed with Reich that this discovery was a "a bomb in physics". Since there was no explanation for the finding, Reich concluded that the heat was the result of a novel form of energy (massfree orgone energy) that accumulated inside the Faraday cage. However, Einstein's assistant, Leopold Infeld, interpreted the phenomenon as the result of thermal convection, but he failed to provide an experimental demonstration of his contention. Einstein reversed himself and concurred that the experiment seemingly could be explained by convection.

Reich and Einstein disagreed on the interpretation of the experiment. The entire correspondence between Reich and Einstein was published by the Orgone Institute Press in a book called The Einstein Affair. Official biographers of Einstein have seen fit to omit or insufficiently describe the only experiment that Einstein conducted with Reich.  The truth is that Einstein was informed that Reich had published 'their affair', the published letter was signed by Einstein, and never contested by Einstein or his legal counsel. So, it was published. Einstein could not come up with an explanation for the finding. This is when Infeld  came up with the interpretation that permitted Einstein to dismiss the finding.

Einstein, after verifying the temperature difference, ceased seeing it as a thermal anomaly as he had originally thought it was, and instead came to regard it as a trivial phenomenon caused by convection of air-currents.

One might venture convection in a room or enclosure that is heated or cooled. But convection can be controlled (dark room conditions, unheated basement, central placement and mid-height, controls with stands, determination of temperature gradients, etc). If the phenomenon (the temperature difference) remains, there is nothing else in the accepted theory of heat that even remotely addresses the question: why should a box develop on its top a temperature greater than the surrounding air?

A box of metal without insulators is a box of thermally-conductive material. When the warm air rises to the top of such a poorly insulated enclosed space, it will conduct out and reach equilibrium with the air temperature of the surrounding room much more rapidly.

Given a suitable amount of time, such a box should equilibrate with the (control) temperature of surrounding ambient air. Even in a room that is neither heated or cooled, but which is subject to small thermal fluctuations, the temperature inside the box should be seen to lag a little and thus generate slight positive differences when the surrounding air would cool a little, and slight negative differences when it would warm up a little. As for the temperature above the box, given a suitable amount of time, it should essentially be the same as the temperature of the surrounding air.

It should. It should but it isn't. Indeed, what is found (Reich, Correas, Mallove) is that, in both cases, the temperature difference is constantly positive.

In 2001, Paulo Correa and Alexandra Correa reproduced the experiment and introduced controls that rule out the possibility of convection as an explanation. A similar reproduction was independently carried out by Eugene Mallove.

Aetherometry, the exact science of the metrics of massfree energy (Aether), is a novel biophysical and nanometric science, or scientific discipline, developed by Dr. Paulo N. Correa and Alexandra N. Correa as a synthesis of experimental and analytical work that replicated, revised and continued the scientific contributions of Nikola Tesla, Louis de Broglie, Wilhelm Reich (orgonomy, orgonometry), René Thom (catastrophe theory) and Harold Aspden. Its object of study is massfree energy.

Massfree energy
Massfree energy is energy devoid of inertia; it is everywhere 'present in space' or associated with various states of motion of material particles or bodies. In a wide sense, massfree energy encompasses Aether manifestations, as well as photon and kinetic energy states. The primordial or Aether manifestations of massfree energy include graviton and antigraviton states affected to matter or its particles, and, more profoundly, the cosmological manifestations of dark energy, in both electric and nonelectric forms, which are associated with the cosmological creation of material particles.

Aetherometry proposes that the world of Matter relates solely, in a strict sense, to the electromagnetic and inertial properties of mass-energy particles, and that even the motion of material or mass-carrying particles or bodies results from the interaction of mass-energy with massfree energy. However, its object of study is not, per se, massfree energy in states that are directly dependent on mass, such as the transient kinetic energy of massbound particles or the electromagnetic energy of blackbody photons. Rather, the primary focus of Aetherometry is the study of massfree energy in nonelectromagnetic forms.

Graviton energy
Gravitons are transient, nonelectromagnetic massfree energy particles whose impulse (gravitational momentum) is anchored to the mass-energy of particles of Matter, but which are emitted from the local Aether medium (formed by the constant and ordered flux of dark massfree energy and cosmological lepton lattices). Both gravitons and antigravitons may also be formed and seated in the composite lattices composing the local Aether medium. Gravitons anchored to mass-energy particles are described mathematically and physically as being in a relationship of secondary superimposition with that mass-energy.

Besides gravitons, Aetherometry has demonstrated the existence of primordial or primary manifestations of massfree energy in both electric and nonelectric forms, also referred to as 'dark massfree energy'.

Ambipolar massfree energy (Orgone and DOR), aka Tesla radiation
Electric massfree energy consists of ambipolar charges that are devoid of inertial effects and propagate longitudinally. In contrast to the monopolar charges (electrons, protons) that characterize ordinary massbound electricity, ambipolar charges continuously alternate between polar states, or, to say it more accurately, constantly vary their polarity during forward propagation. Ambipolar electricity is a massfree phenomenon. Field capture of ambipolar energy by massbound (monopolar) charges results in their acceleration; deceleration of the same massbound charges results in the local production of blackbody photons. The Correas have published the cosmic spectrum of ambipolar radiation and the corresponding blackbody spectra emitted from electrons and protons, providing exact new equations that profoundly alter the conventional theory of electromagnetism. They have also demonstrated how the continuous ambipolar spectrum contains two biologically and physically distinct regions that correspond to W. Reich's distinction between orgone (OR) energy and DOR (dorgone or deadly orgone). The cutoff between OR and DOR occurs at 79.4 keV. This is a strictly aetherometric discovery.

Latent heat or latent massfree energy
Nonelectric massfree energy exists in both unbound and massbound states. In massbound states, it is responsible for the energy of state of molecular phases, the intrinsic energy of gases, specific latent heats, most of the atmospheric energy, and the noncovalent bond energies exploited by all living systems. Its generic designation is molecular latent heat. In unbound states, massfree latent energy is responsible for the cosmological creation of space and the direction (diachronism) and synchronicity of absolute Time. The superimposition of unbound massfree latent energy yields what is physically and mathematically designated as the phase energy which permits the creation of mass-energy and associated gravitons (*secondary superimposition*). Thus, Aetherometry affirms that all mass-energy is a transient construct of the phase superimposition of latent massfree energy, the composite effect of Aether energy units.

Blackbody radiation is composed of nonionizing thermal, optical and supra-optical 'electromagnetic' (photon) radiation, forming what is called radiative (sensible) heat. Ambipolar orgone radiation indirectly gives rise (through the 'medium' of electrons) to blackbody radiation having wavelengths greater than 300 nanometers. Ambipolar DOR radiation indirectly gives rise to blackbody (Hallwacks) photons in the UVB and UV-C ranges, up to the shortest 47nm blackbody radiation (end of the blackbody spectrum).

Note that sensible heat, unlike latent heat, is composed of thermal drift kinetons (molecular heat) and blackbody photons (radiative heat)

Photons (ionizing or nonionizing), 'kinetons', gravitons, ambipolar charges and particles or units of latent massfree energy are all massfree particles associated with specific physical interactions or manifestations. The demonstration of these particles' existence, and the proposed new model and mathematical formalism (see Aetherometric Microfunctional Transformative Algebra below) that address their specific properties, have been extracted from a nexus of systematic and diverse experimental investigations into physical and biological systems, gathered under the rubrics of Experimental Aetherometry, Aetherometric Biology, and The Aetherometric Theory of Synchronicity (AToS).

A photon is a swing (a particle, a conjunction of waves, and an energy packet) of electromagnetic energy. Its particulate aspect relates to its linear momentum (its existence as a particle) and the pressure it exerts upon adjacent matter. Its quantization relates to its constant of angular momentum, and its quantized energy forms two distinct spectra - blackbody and ionizing. Photons do not travel through space, nor do they have a fibrous structure. Photons are globular, not fascicular, and they are created and destroyed on the spot - ie local productions. Rays are simply a probabilistic way of approximating the physical reality of the phase or excitation wave that transmits 'across space' the indirect stimulus for the production of light. In the case of blackbody photons, a mediating term must always intervene between the phase wave and the production of photons, or light; the mediating term is always a massbound charge.

1. On the nature of photons

It is the view of aetherometric theory that solar radiation does not consist of photons, but of the massfree electrical charges that compose the Ôsolar electrical field [http://aetherometry.com/abs-AS2v2B.html#abstractAS2-17A]. Moreover, it is also the view of aetherometric theory that photons are 'punctual' and local productions, that they do not travel through space but rather occupy a globular space where they are created and extinguished.

1.2. If photons do not travel through space, what is it that travels through space and is the cause of the transmission of the light stimulus, and ultimately of any local production of photons?

Aetherometry contends that what travels through space and transmits the light impulse is electrical radiation composed of massfree charges and their associated longitudinal waves (the true phase waves), not electromagnetic radiation composed of photons and their transverse waves. The wave transmission of all electromagnetic signals depends on the transmission of nonelectromagnetic energy, specifically the transmission of electric massfree charges (the propagation of Òthe fieldÓ).

1.3. There are two types of photons: ionizing and nonionizing (blackbody). Aetherometry recognizes this accepted distinction, but suggests that it is a distinction still more profound than accepted physics itself holds, in that the two spectra are different as to the very conditions necessary for the production of one or the other type of photons. Specifically, Aetherometry claims that nonionizing or blackbody photons are locally generated whenever material particles that act as charge-carriers decelerate. Thus photons mark the trail of deceleration of massbound particles. This punctual generation of photons that marks the trails of decelerating massbound charges, combined with the decay in the kinetic energy of these charges, their release and scattered reabsorption by other adjacent massbound charges (thus causing so called conversion of electromagnetic energy into longer wavelength radiation), is what accounts for (1) the dispersion of energy through conversion into electromagnetic radiation (and Tesla's persistent claim that his power transmitters were not transmitters of electromagnetic radiation) and for (2) the approximate suitability of the stochastic model for the dispersion of a ray and the scatter of light.

Conversely, material particles or massbound charges accelerate when an electrical, magnetic, or electrical-cum-magnetic field is applied to them. Aetherometry contends that, in nature, an applied field is composed of massfree electric radiation, the effect of the radiation of massfree charges being the acquisition of their energy by the massbound charges they encounter (ergo the addition of a kinetic energy term to the energy associated with the rest mass of a material particle), and thus the acceleration of these massbound charges [http://aetherometry.com/abs-AS2v2B.html#abstractAS2-16]. In summary, Aetherometry claims that 'radiation' of massfree charges is responsible for the acceleration of massbound charges, whereas it is the deceleration of the latter which converts the lost kinetic energy into a local generation of blackbody photons.

2. What are electromagnetic, and electric and magnetic waves?
2.1. Currently, it is held that photons constitute electromagnetic radiation having an electric field vector E and a transverse magnetic field vector H. Because solar radiation is believed to consist of photons, it is also said to be electrical, since photons have an electrical field.

Aetherometry argues that photons do indeed possess two transverse 'fields' or, more properly, waves or wave functions. It acknowledges that the two 'fields' have been assimilated to the concept of transverse electric and magnetic fields, from Faraday and Maxwell to present-day conceptions. However, it contends that these 'fields' are elements derived from defined wave functions, and that these wave functions only belong to charged particles, not to photons which, as particles of light, lack electrical charge. In fact, these authors propose that the fundamental relationship is that which de Broglie proposed as being needed to integrate quantum-mechanics with wave-mechanics:

E = m0 c2 = hυ

where m0 denotes the inertial mass that one should associate with the photon when considered in its rest frame (ie the electromagnetic frame of reference). Note that for this relationship to hold, the photon must have a very small but finite inertial or rest mass, as given by m0, and cannot therefore be classified as a massfree particle. Now, note that the function c2 indicates the square superimposition of two waves having the same value. The question then becomes whether these electromagnetic waves are formed and described by electrical and magnetic field vectors. To answer it, we must look for an indication of comparable waves in the structure of material particles. Here, also, consideration of an electron, for example, in its rest frame, indicates that it has energy equal to

E = me c2 = hυ

where the frequency υ is the Compton electron frequency. It would appear therefore that one would have to concur with the electromagnetic nature of matter. However, Aetherometry claims to have identified the fine structure of material particles such as the electron, and claims that this structure is not directly electromagnetic, even if it has an electromagnetic equivalence.

In fact, aetherometric theory claims that the relationship E = me c2 = hυ, when considered as a physical reality, only applies to the maximal X-ray photon with the Compton-electron wavelength that can be extracted from the conversion of the rest energy of an electron into electromagnetic energy (ionizing photon). It describes solely the photon equivalence to the electron rest energy, and it constitutes, as is well known, the limit X-ray radiation obtainable from an electron. But it does not describe the structure - the electrical structure - of that electron rest energy. That is something that only aetherometric theory claims to describe. The latter has, in fact, advanced the view that the structure of the electron is that of a torus composed by the superimposition of two electrical waves (one 'electrical', Wv, the other 'magnetic' Wk), where mass is equivalent solely to the multiple of the wavelength of one of these waves, or the number of these waves composing, as rings, the electron torus. Aetherometry has proposed exact values for these wave functions, which provide an alternative explanation for de BroglieÕs theory of Matter Waves, and the phenomenology of mass-increase with acceleration that is central to the theory of special relativity.

The master equation that has been proposed is

E = λe Wk Wv

which is algebraically equivalent to the rest mass described by

λe c2 = me c2

where λe is the wavelength-equivalent of the rest mass of the ordinary electron (an exact quantity identified by experimental Aetherometry). Hence, Aetherometry has proposed the exact equivalence:

E = λe Wk Wv = λe c2 = me c2

Physically, this means that the structure of an electron is finite (has volume, temporal and undulatory characteristics), and that it is an electric structure. A short demonstration and formal proof of the assertion is that the same mass-energy can be written with reference to the elementary electrical charge q, as:

E = λe Wk Wv = q Wv

For inertial purposes, or with respect to the electromagnetic frame (or any such frame), this electrical structure is 'seen' as having the inertial property described by λe c2 = me c2. And likewise, whenever this rest energy is effectively transformed into an ionizing photon (by impact, to generate the limit X-ray, as in production of photoelectrons, or by pair-annihilation, to generate a gamma-ray), the electrical structure of that electron is dissolved, and its inertial or rest energy equivalent becomes effectively transformed into electromagnetic energy in conformity to the real conversion given by me c2 = hυ. This also serves as a demonstration that the 'rest' energy frame of a particle or a body is also its electromagnetic frame.

Furthermore, these new algebraic physical functions led aetherometric theory to claim that, likewise, the photon relation (E = m0 c2 = hυ) proposed by de Broglie has an equivalent that can be written as (E = λ0 c2 = hυ). This serves to highlight that, whereas the structure of electronic matter at a nanometric scale is electrical and forms a recognizable geometric object, a torus, the structure of a photon is what takes on the generic form of inertia, as per (λ0 c2 = hυ). Photons are the particles constituted by the structure c2, not elements of matter or electrons. The latter are only perceived as having an equivalent wave structure c2 when they are seized in their rest frame or their electromagnetic frame, or transformed into ionizing photons. But the structure of elements of matter while they remain such is electrical, described by the wave-product (Wk Wv), rather than c2. Hence, Aetherometry contends, the finite geometry of photons is globular, forming a quasi-sphere, and composed of two identical waves, whereas the finite geometry of electrons is toroidal and composed of two different waves, one truly electrical and the other truly magnetic. Accordingly, the waves of photons are only geometric product equivalents of the real electric and magnetic waves which compose either the rest mass of a material particle, or its kinetic energy. Therefore Aetherometry argues that photons do indeed possess two transverse fields, but the two fields or their vectors are organized such as to describe a local globularizing vortex, each relating a sine wave, and each wave being described by c in the fundamental derived or resultant relationship (E = m0 c2 = hυ).

Accordingly, Aetherometry explicitly argues that photons do not really have electrical or magnetic fields; this is in accordance with the fact that photons do not present electrical charge and that thus one does not mistake them for electrons! What possesses electrical and magnetic fields are charges, whether massfree or massbound. The latter, furthermore, possess such fields as are associated with their rest energy and also with the energy of their motion.

2.2. In accordance with the preceding, Aetherometry claims that solar radiation is electrical, not because it is composed of photons, but because it consists of propagating massfree charges. Unlike massbound charges, massfree charges have no fixed spin orientation with respect to forward propagation. They can be thought of as net spin 0 charges. But at any time, they may have an effective spin that is either -1/2 or +1/2 (actually, -1 and +1, as spin, in Aetherometry, is a number property of angular momentum, not of the number of 'hyperdimensions' attributed to states of polarization, as it is in Quantum Electrodynamics). They also have transverse, or near-transverse, electrical and magnetic fields, waves and field wave-vectors. But whereas the waves composing a photon are analogous to the transverse waves that propagate in water and limited to circularized motion, the waves composing a massfree charge are analogous to the longitudinal pressure waves responsible for the forward propagation of sound. Massfree charges cannot be described as occupying or forming a globular space, or even a toroidal one, but as occupying or forming a forward-moving cycloidal helix.

Both types of waves are involved in the propagation of the light stimulus and the generation of light: longitudinal electric waves with their transverse magnetic waves - in the propagation of the light-stimulus; and transverse vibrations in fragments of the kinetic energy released from massbound charges - ie, in the local production of blackbody photons. But these two sets of waves belong to two distinct physical objects - massfree charges and the photons formed when massbound charges decelerate.

2.3. Photons and massfree charges also differ in their physical effects. Photons are not deviated, displaced or disturbed by electrical or magnetic fields. Yet one can magnetically polarize the transmission of light. This is because the transmission of light is effectuated by massfree charges and their longitudinal waves, not by photons and their transversal vibrations. So-called plane polarization of light is, in effect, a magnetic filter, and the addition of a magnet and its rotation or movement will gate the wave function and twist of the longitudinal wave and massfree charge transmitting the light-stimulus.

Unlike massbound charges, photons cannot charge an electroscope. This is a well established fact, and it applies to both ionizing and blackbody photons. However, as discovered empirically by the Correas, if photons are nonionizing and with wavelengths greater than 300, they can arrest the spontaneous electroscopic discharge irrespective of polarity (please note blackbody photons with wavelengths less than 300 discharge electrosopes, as per the Hallwacks or photoelectric effect) [http://aetherometry.com/abs-AS2v2A.html#abstractAS2-08]. All blackbody photons trigger photoelectric cells [http://aetherometry.com/abs-AS2v2A.html#abstractAS2-13]. Photons are not detected by Tesla antennas (see Tesla, N (1901) ÒApparatus for the utilization of radiant energyÓ, USPTO # 685,957) connected as unipolar inputs to Geiger-Muller circuits [http://aetherometry.com/abs-AS2v2A.html#abstractAS2-13].

As discovered by the Correas, massfree charges can positively charge a proximal electroscope by stripping valence electrons, but in general (in 'distal positions') they accelerate the spontaneous electroscopic discharge of negatively charged electroscopes, but not positively charged ones [http://aetherometry.com/abs-AS2v2A.html#abstractAS2-13]. Massfree charges do not trigger photoelectric cells. Massfree charges are easily detected by Tesla antennas connected as unipolar inputs to Geiger-Muller circuits.

3. Are photons massfree particles or massbound particles?
3.1. It is currently held that photons have zero rest mass, and thus that they are massfree.

Consensus on this matter is a controversial subject. Operationally, if photons have mass, it is so small that one 'feels permitted' to disregard it. But disregard is not proof of zero rest mass. And smallness is not a characteristic that impugns the physical properties of an object.

Moreover, de Broglie himself (so say the authorities A.P. French and E. F. Taylor) began by assuming that Òevery particle of light, whatever its quantum energy, has a certain rest mass m0Ó (An Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, p. 56). A.S. Goldhaber and M.M. Nieto placed strict upper limits on the rest mass of photons (Rev Mod Phys, 1971, 43:277), but there is no evidence that indicates that the rest mass of a photon is anything but zero.

Aetherometry contends that the relationship (m0 c2 = hυ) proposed by de Broglie, is a fictional relationship; that, effectively, the photon has no rest energy or mass-energy. But it also proposes that there is truth to the de Broglie relation, because the structure of the photon, being massfree, is what should be written as (λ0 c2 = hυ).

As a sidenote, Aetherometry does not need to take recourse to the notion that an alternative to General Relativity must invoke massbound photons subject to deviation by local gravitational fields. Since all blackbody photon production is local and the result of decelerating massbound charges, the scatter of the latter and its relative direction are sufficient to explain observed redshift distributions, as well as the much reviled or ignored distributions of blueshifts, without any need for an invocation of the bending of light by spacetime or its gravitational field.

3.2. Moreover, the Correas have publicly and explicitly contended that photons are not the only form of massfree ÔradiationÕ in nature. They have contended that photons do not constitute (directed) electrical radiation, but (scattered) electromagnetic radiation. Calling them radiation is already a sort of semantic freedom, since they arise and extinguish locally, and do not propagate across space - it is the scatter of that local production that spreads through space. That which radiates across space, is not electromagnetic energy, nor does it necessarily disperse or 'scatter'; what travels through space to transmit the light stimulus, and is a component of space itself, is electric longitudinal wave energy - the energy of undulatory massfree charges. And what travels across space and punctually produces photons are massbound charges that have absorbed the undulatory energy of massfree charges as their own kinetic energy, and thus underwent a 'field acceleration'. Light is the byproduct of the interaction between ambipolar radiation and massbound charges, a marker generated upon deceleration of these charges, when they scatter. Without the acceleration caused by the interaction of massfree and massbound charges, no blackbody photons can be produced by the scatter of massbound charges.

Other authors have spoken of a reality akin in some respects to the aetherometric claim of the existence of massfree (ambipolar) charges: Tesla spoke of 'nonordinary electricity', 'primary electricity', 'ether electricity', 'longitudinal electric waves distinct from electromagnetic radiation', manifestations that have fallen under the rubric of Tesla waves or Tesla radiation; Reich spoke of his massfree orgone energy and orgone charges; Cerenkov spoke of a pilot or phase wave that transmitted 'potential', or its 'envelope', at speeds greater than c, but did not transport electromagnetic energy; Maximo Aucci and Thomas Bearden have described massless electrons associated with longitudinal electric field propagation; Harold Aspden has described cosmological charges that escape the constraints of mass-based relativity, as elements of a dynamic Aether of space.

Aetherometric theory contends that the exact functions, formulas and spectrum which the Correas have discovered for Tesla radiation are the physical functions behind the transmission of the light stimulus, and are what all of the authors and researchers mentioned above have striven to understand and describe with new physical functions and models, whose shortcomings the aetherometric theory claims to overcome.

The fundamental aetherometric concept is the expanded function of energy. Energy is a five-dimensional event, capable of phase superimposition in multiples of five-dimensional events ('raising energy to the nth power'). With this new functional approach, the energy-event becomes a micromachine, a wave-synthesizer capable of fine-structure definition. Energy is not simply the potentiality of work, but work seen or unseen, useful or useless, converted or not. The continuous creation of Space across sequential instants of Time is the ontological work of energy, the evidence that a flux of energy has a power and performs sensible work. Space is, in this sense, the work of the perpetual flux of massfree energy, just as universal Time is at once its synchronous beat and its eternal duration. Energy flows in packets, in quantized units, whether Planckian or not. Energy flux is "molecularized" or particulate. Every energy unit (see Leibniz's monad), irrespective of physical nature, is a synthesis of a spatial volume flowing or 'beating' with a resonant simultaneity, the production of a difference being found at the core of the new concept of energy: energy is a synthesis of the different - particle and waves, Space and Time manifolds, conjugate series of physical objects, different constituents, different properties or qualia.

Intrinsic simultaneity
At the core of every energy unit there is a structural simultaneity that keeps particle and wave solidary, and permits noninterpretable, exact spatiotemporal maps of events and physicochemical processes. This structural simultaneity is directly expressed by the specific synchronisms of the Time manifold constitutive of any given energy unit, whether massfree or massbound. Hence, at the antipodes of Relativity (itself an undue generalization of the relationism of all motion - also called exoreference or relative coordinatization of motion), Aetherometry uncovers the fundamental synchronism (and its variations as synchronicities) that gives consistency to all energy units, and proposes a method for endoreference or absolute coordinatization of motion and physical quantities. The simultaneity of a universal Time is not merely qualitative, as for Henri Bergson, but quantitative and intrinsic to energy units and processes: energy itself (and every one of its units in any form) 'is' able to time itself, or measure itself, with immanent metrics (endoreference) put into evidence by the fine-structure solutions to every energy form.

Energy conservation and conversion
Energy constitutes a seamless spatiotemporal continuum because of the iterative property of each energy unit in Time. The conservation of energy is a consequence of this iterative property, of its diachronicity, and of its axiomatic application to the total energy of the universe as a finite quantity. When not conserved, energy units are converted. Energy forms may be created, conserved, destroyed, or converted. Not so energy: energy is neither created nor destroyed, only conserved or converted. To paraphrase Dr. Eugene Mallove's comment on aetherometric physics, the First Law can be succinctly stated as - the being of energy is 'Aethernal".

New concepts and functions for wave and particle synthesis
Each energy unit is a particulate synthesis of waves or wavefunctions. Every energy form or manifestation displays a specific particle and wave configuration, characteristic of the type of energy interaction (electromagnetic, gravitational, electrodynamic, etc). Aetherometry has identified exactly the intrinsic or hidden metrics of all energy interactions and of energy units or packets, whether massfree, massbound, or in some form associated with massbound particles (eg kinetons, photons, gravitons and antigravitons). These transformative metric relationships are the object of a new system of (micro)functional algebraic equations that open the boundaries of existing physico-mathematical theories to a new analysis of dynamic physical and biological processes. Morphology is no more separate from energy, from its processes and transformations, than topology may be mapped out while being divorced from geometry and metrics - that is, if science and mathematical language are to actually follow the internal dynamics of systems, instead of simply replacing them with static appearances and convoluted approximations.

Aetherometry has provided novel wave-synchronous and resonance-coherent, solidary particle-and- wave solutions for virtually all energy structures and interactions. Every energy flux is a flux of energy units, massbound or massfree. Each unit has the dimensions of energy, and coheres a particle function with a phase or external wave. It also establishes a synchronizing resonance between the group wave intrinsic to the particle and the external guide wave. The coupling of these two wave functions - that is intrinsic to every energy coupling between a particle and a field wave - is referred to as primary superimposition. Synchronism of energy flow is a property of the primary superimposition of waves, of the internal consistency of every energy unit. Basic endoreference systems are created by primary superimposition.

Wherever energy flows, particles, whether massbound or massfree, move in relative and absolute senses (molecular or quantum view of energy). And wherever particles move, resonant waves transmit them, propel them (subquantic view of energy). A particle is nothing but the undulatory transmission of a unit of linear momentum intrinsic to an energy flux.

Particles come in two main varieties - those that are massbound (particles of Matter) and those that are massfree. Whereas multiple particles of matter cannot simultaneously occupy the same abstract space, massfree particles can do so; massfree particles can superimpose with each other to form what are called phase energy structures, and they can also superimpose with particles of matter. The kinetic energy of a particle of matter (i.e. the energy of motion that is affected to it) is, in fact, massfree energy in a state of transient superimposition with the mass-energy of the particle being displaced. Aether lattices are phase energy structures, and mass-energy when considered together with its associated massfree graviton is also a phase energy structure. These structures have specific geometries, and thus there is finite volumetric structure to all manifestations of energy. Electrons and protons have toroidal structures; photons are globular; kinetons, gravitons and ambipolar charges constitute various helico-trochoidal structures.

Massbound particles have the property of inertia, and are monopolarly charged (neutrons are massbound charge composites and decay products only). All massbound particles obey Planck's law for the quantization of angular momentum (as a principle of action and in aetherometric fine-structure). And so do two other classes of massfree energy: photons (whether blackbody or ionizing) and 'kinetons'. Ambipolar charges, whether of the OR or DOR types, obey Planck's law with respect to their action, but not their fine-structure.

The novel methodology can be qualified as a micro-functionalist approach that has developed a new mathematical language - a microfunctional transformative algebra - capable of addressing the physical and mathematical properties of fine-structure 'objects' (energy units and energy interactions or processes). Precise physical determinations, including those technically forbidden by the Born-Heisenberg Principle, are carried out with dimensional measurements directly expressed in an expanded meter-second system, having full and exact conversion to conventional mass-length-time systems of measurement. The new aetherometric methodology and its analytical language permit exact correlation of physical modelling with metric and geometric structure, identification of fine-structure and precise description of dynamic processes. Development of the new microfunctional algebra, of an adequate and also more exact physical and mathematical language, was integral to an experimental process that elicited and permitted its enunciation, as well as directed it by constant testing.

The new aetherometric language synthesizes contributions from various scientists and thinkers: a critical review of De Broglie's theory of Matter-Waves; the basic transformative functions enunciated by W. Reich in his Orgonomic Functionalism; the structural and morphogenetic functions for homeomorphism, and especially steady-state amplification of minor fluctuations, in the work of C. Waddington, E. Zimmerman and R. Thom in particular (Catastrophe theory); and, finally, the 'machinic propositions' of Molecular Functionalism or Micro-Functionalism enunciated and applied by G. Deleuze and F. Guattari.

Aetherometric theory employs a micro-functionalist approach to the analytical synthesis of different manifolds or multiplicities - qualitative and quantitative, spatial and temporal, particulate and undulatory, momentum and velocity, moment and angular frequency. Its key concepts are functional processes and immanent properties such as: multiplicity or manifold (eg Space and Time); transformation (eg energy conversion, dimensional transformation of mass into length and wavelength, coordinate-system transformation, phase energy superimposition, etc); energy commensurability (eg of manifolds, of their constituents); analytical disjunction or bifurcation (eg of qualitatively different series of physical objects, of particle-decay processes, of regimes of functioning, of proliferating series, etc) and analytical conjunction (eg creation of particulate mass as resolution of secondary superimposition, synthesis of distinct manifolds or of constitutents, etc); and functional constituents (elements of distinct series brought into relation, machinic indices).

Fundamental forms of transformation involve either superimposition or differential processes (differentials), or both.

Primary superimposition processes relate directly to the fine-structure of energy units, to the wave superimposition that keeps every particle solidary with its associated wavefunctions. It is in the nature of energy to flow because all energy is undulatory motion. Every energy unit is the product of a primary superimposition - of a particle with a wave, of momentum with velocity, of a charge with a voltage potential, etc.

Secondary superimposition processes are phase energy (phase Space and phase Time) processes that couple together either massfree energy units (eg in the cosmological creation of leptons by secondary superimposition of fundamental latent massfree energy units) or the field properties of massbound energy units (eg in electrodynamic interactions, in secondary gravitational interactions). Secondary superimposition processes present phase-energy raised to a power > 1: phase-energy may be squared (eg the limit case of the electrodynamic interaction), cubed (eg the cosmological process responsible for the production of the cosmic microwave background) or raised to the 4th power (eg in the differential structure of 'vacuum' lattices).

Tertiary processes of superimposition refer in general to energy conversions that generate kinetons or photons. Kinetic energy is captured from an external field to sustain motion, and its fine structure adapts to the fine-structure of the mass-energy whose motion it accelerates. In turn, deceleration of massbound particles generates blackbody photons whose structure is a quantum derivative of the kineton being shed. Photons result from the decomposition of kinetons. Kinetons are units of massfree energy transiently associated with massbound particles and responsible for their motion. Photons are units of tertiary massfree energy generated as the pathway for the return of kinetic energy to the Aether medium. Blackbody photons are detached fragments of decomposing kinetons. Unless the photon energy is absorbed by a massbound particle, it transforms into latent massfree energy.

Laws and processes: old and new
Aetherometric theory has generated entirely new, algebraic expressions that provide exact formulations for a wide variety of fundamental constants, laws and processes of physics, such as: the fine-structure constant; Ohm's Law; the Duane-Hunt Law; Planck's Law; the Ideal Gas Law; Aspden's Law of Electrodynamics; the Nernst equation; Gibbs free energy; the impedance of the 'vacuum'; the magnetic permeability of the 'vacuum' (invariant for photons and variable for massfree and massbound charges); the electric energy of electrostatic interactions; entropy; the internal energy function of a system; the total energy of a system.

Aetherometry has also discovered and identified precise physico-mathematical functions for other fundamental physical and biophysical laws and processes, amongst which: the electric fine-structure of the electron and proton mass-energies; the fine-structure of massbound and massfree charges in vacuo and in material media; the invariant electric permittivity of the vacuum to ambipolar and photon radiations; the variable permittivity of the vacuum to massbound charges; the antigravitational work of electrostatic charge lattices; the energy, momentum and wave structure of gravitons, massfree charges and latent energy units; the blackbody photon radiation law; primary and secondary gravitational interactions; the functional equivalence and nonidentity of inertial mass and gravitational wavelength; a new algorithm for linear-log integration of acid-base and redox reactions; a new model of electronic orbitals with original volumetric and dynamic structures for covalent and noncovalent (van der Waals) bonds; spectral identification of massfree inductive, receiver, transformer and transmitter functions of genomic DNA and genomic RNA.

Units and constants: old and new
Aetherometric theory has discovered the exact values in the exclusively aetherometric meter-second system for all nonfictional conventional constants and units. The following are a few examples, all of which have now been published: the fundamental electric charge; the electron and proton mass-energies; Planck's constant; the volt and electron-volt; the universal force constant G; Hartree energy; Boltzmann's constant; the ampere; the ohm; the henry; the joule; the calorie; the watt; the gauss; the tesla; the weber; the newton; the farad; the degree Kelvin.

Aetherometric theory has also generated exact values for new, far more exacting physical constants. Some of these new aetherometric constants are: the wavelength-equivalent of the electron inertial mass; the Duane-Hunt wavelength; the charge-carrier intrinsic magnetic wavefunction; the apparent velocity of propagation of gravity; the electron-graviton frequency; the cut-off ambipolar frequency separating OR and DOR subspectra; the upper limit frequencies of both spectra, ambipolar and blackbody; the fundamental electron-Aether energy element; the cosmic acceleration constant; the graviton acceleration constant.

In the fields of Hematology and Radiation Biology (including Photobiology and Radiobiology) aetherometric breakthroughs include new insights into the differential growth of blood-cells and their biophysical responses to electromagnetic and nonelectromagnetic (Aether) radiations, the distinct biological effects of high-frequency and low-frequency blackbody photons, the demonstration of hitherto unknown properties of globins relating to their capacity to absorb ambipolar radiation and release sensible heat, and a novel understanding of the nature and structure of the biological field captured by Kirlian photography. In Physiology, they include a solution to the insufficient potential of the respiratory chain, new functions proposed for oxygen in aerobic metabolism, and a contribution towards the elucidation of dark photosynthesis and futile metabolic cycles. In Molecular Biology and System Dynamics, they have yielded a new internal energy function for biological systems, a new treatment of the concept and functions of entropy, and an aethero-dynamic understanding of the folding of polypeptides and the role of latent heat in the catalytic functions of enzymes or allosteric proteins. In the fields of Chemistry and Biochemistry, breakthroughs include a new analytical log scale for the concentration of massbound charge in solutions (a scale that integrates acid-base and redox reactions), complete cycles for the ionic and free-radical formation and dissociation of water and hydrogen, and an original understanding of the role of latent heat in the formation of ATP (Adenosine Triphosphate) and its hydrolysis. Perhaps the finest achievements of Aetherometry relate to Nanometric Biology and Biopoiesis - such as the proposed new volumetric and electronic structures of covalent and noncovalent (van der Waals) bonds, and the massfree inductive receiver, transformer and transmitter functions identified for genomic DNA and genomic RNA (as in simple RNA-organisms such as the Tobacco Mosaic Virus), leading to a new model of the subcellular origins of Life.

These significant breakthroughs effectively lay the foundations for an integral Biophysics of Energy capable of going beyond present day mechanistic or axiomatic Biology and the mere probabilistics of Genetics, for it can now account not only for the interaction of biological systems with Matter, with material fluxes of massbound charges and molecular materials, but also for the precise interaction of those systems with massfree energy in all of its physical forms.

The consequences of these breakthroughs of Aetherometric Biophysics are potentially extraordinary, if we consider their application to Medicine and Oncology. Since not all radiant energy is electromagnetic (contrary to the claim made in the very first sentence of the Wikipedia article on radiant energy), new possibilities for the use of radiative techniques arise with respect to the engineering of massfree energy for medical therapeutic testing and use.

When Leo Szilard learned that biological clocks were not fundamentally affected by temperature, he commented - "if there is an undiscovered principle of physics, it seems likely that the biosphere will have employed it". Aetherometric Biology demonstrates - theoretically, analytically and experimentally - that this undiscovered principle of physics universally employed by biological systems is massfree energy, since the energetic Aether is precisely that energy principle which the biosphere employs to control its synthetic machinery.

FFFFFFUUUUUUUUU  TO MUCH KNOWLEGE

that was the most fascinating stuff I never read

"uhhh it's a field"

>>5-12
100% Grade A Bullshit. I know it's copy pasta, but just in case there's anyone retarded enough to blindly believe it, I'm telling you now. I didn't see a single sentence after the first three that wasn't either a complete fabrication or a bold-faced lie. Cripes.

>>16
Mind refuting any of it, chum?

i was reading this is  bullshit.

>>4
ironic that you don't know jack shit, moron

>>4
you think aether is probability with a capital P and you call other people an idiot?  haha  you're so enamoured with metaphors that you lost sight of what is even meant by the term and defined one metaphor with another metaphor and then pretended to actually have knowledge