Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

A probability question..

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-21 8:42

Here's the question:

At a certain stage of a criminal investigation, the inspector in charge is 60% convinced of the guilt of a certain suspect. Suppose now that a new piece of evidence that shows that the criminal has a certain characteristic (such as left-handedness, baldness, brown hair, etc.) is uncovered. If 20% of the population possesses this characteristic, how certain of the guilt of the suspect should the inspector now be if it turns out that the suspect has this characterstic?

I have an exam next week on probability and random processes, and I can't solve this question, any ideas?

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-21 8:53

That's a stupid question.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-21 10:46

100% guilty, if he's in Guantanamo bay.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-21 13:15

What a retarded word problem. Criminal investigations do not work that way. You don't go to jail if you rack up a "100%" suspicion of guilt. Plus, the initial "60%" (as well as the relative importance of the undefined new evidence) is completely arbitrary, subjective, and without perspective.

There is no answer to the stated question because it makes no fucking sense. Drop out of school now and learn to flip burgers, retard.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-21 15:16

>>4
You are very rude.  I can not abide your rudeness.  I can not abide any rude response you may have.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-21 15:19

Anyway the problem reads like it is directing you toward using the Bayes' theorem.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-21 21:03

>>4

Welcome to Guantanamo bay.

You are not innocent.

Rape imminent.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-21 21:31

(1 - .4*.2)*100 = 92%

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List