Should I serve the Dark Lord?

Don't get me wrong I'm a very compassionate and fair man, but the rest of the world doesn't seem to be. Isn't it compassionate and fair that I give to them what they've given to me? Anger and hatred? The only difference is I have a reason to be angry and hateful, they never had a reason. So I've been thinking, do you think I should start worshipping evil Norse or Greek Gods?

If someone wishes to debate you on faith, belief, or religion please have them reference the intangibile nature of faith, belief, and religion along with the text-book definition of debate. They essentially have no argument and are pathetically attempting to negotiate the terms of your surrender. Surrender to what? Where's the threat? Words? Of course, when you use this understanding against someone who is gowding you into surrendering you need only confound them and in the same breath stand your ground. Doing this my practice for combating my ego, cause my ego would really like to stomp them into the ground or acquiesce to be safe. I would rather confound that person's ego just as practice with mine.
"Know thyself and you shall know the Universe and of its workings"
"What we have here is a failure to communicate." My symbols don't match your symbols even though the reference is essentially similar. This is grounds for a witch hunt. Imagine it as though each individual has their own dictionary and while many have similar words matchin similar meanings, a vast majority have similar words with different meaning and contextual usages. It is from this observation, [communication, cooperation](unification), and segregation (recognizing differences)that I find myself bombarded with epiphany after epiphany that Truth and Lie; Good and Evil; Heaven and Hell is all a matter of personal perception. I have the idea that possibly when we are attacked or confronted with conflict we forget or ignore the internal conflict and project the self-preserving features of the ego (the ego's vested interest is preserving itself and its environment, ie the human body). I'm not going to debate whether or not this is all true, because it's not scientific to debate ideas, faith, or personal beliefs; perhaps only to discuss them is the best way to understand the other person and, in doing so, yourself. I have already begun a scientific experiment around self-awareness, segregation, religion, and science. My faith has brought me down to the understanding of ONE idea that is consistantly pronounced through every idea I have and helps me to combat my ego just a little at a time. "Potential" From my perception potential is in the future meaning the outcome of potential is as yet unseen only possible via my activities of the past, and I can observe the reactions of these activities in the present. The way I believe it stands for myself is Future/Potential/Self-Awareness; Present/Kinetic/Self-Preservation; Past/History/Self-Reflection. With the information I've gathered, I am attempting to perform Self-Awareness activities so the potential for Transcendence or Enlightenment or Self-Awareness will be greater and thereby highly increasing the chances and opportunity and potentials for further exploration and experimentation and further uncover means and methods of self-preservation. When you perform an action that sets you currently in a anxiety-based environment and you are not able to observe a clear and present danger, what danger can come from performing the needed potential-increasing task? It is from this that I have looked at a variety of reactions through conversation, chemical, atomic, cellular, and human interactions that if we are able to visualize, using our imaginations, potential of everything we may have a better chance at coming closer to the idea of what a creator really is. Purhaps one who creates the opportunity, time, place, and materials may in fact be the action of energy when combined with potential interaction the following basic potentials of everything (|Destruction|<----Decay----|Creation|---Adaptation---->|Potentiality|. It is my hope then that Science and Faith will become close friends, but perhaps not for some time. Too many distractions have occured in the past 100 years alone to shield our eyes from ourselves. I wonder what choice you'll make sir, regarding the "Dark Lord" or perhaps "God" of Jews or "Jesus" of Christianity or possibly the "Eternal Path;Eternal Law" as in Sanatana Dharma Hinduism. For myself, I have chosen to keep myself seperate of other people's ideas, but utilize their ideas to support my own through commonalities such as scapegoating and the ego projecting its destructive capabilities onto others and blame them, destroy them such as with Jesus on the Cross, such as Cain blaming God for him having to kill his own flesh and blood in order to appease God when it was Cain's personal choice to do so. Also, in the garden of eden with the tree and the fruit and the snake, what happened after the temptation? Adam was approached by God and querried as to his actions of hiding his nakedness and upon God having the epiphany that, the only way someone becomes aware is by eating of the fruit from the tree, Adam had eaten the fruit from the tree and upon this Adam retorted, "It was Eve who tempted me into eating the fruit, and upon God confronting Eve the like happened but that Adamn did not tempt her, and Adam had betrayed her trust by blaming her, she blamed the snake; the original tempter. And so, with most signs of the devil you will notice that there is a goat of some sort representing the scapegoat or the goat of baphomet, you may also realize that there is a five-pointed star representing the five senses or five fingers on the hand. Notice that this star cannot be seperated, but it can be identified from it's use of symbology. What about the Star of David? The Star of David can be seperated and represents the male and female that is inherent in each and everyone of us, but can be seperated as with mother and father, combined makes child (solitary individual). This is the only means of explanation I am able to provide, but further research must come from myself, and has the "POTENTIAL" to come from others should they find the idea interesting and wish to become involved in Self-Fulfillment. These are supporting ideas, religions, common denominators that support my Hypothesis of (1). It is possible that this idea may lead to my own discovery that this is the representation that was proposed as the idea behind monotheism as in "One God"; but truly that is my own speculation and I won't prescribe to anything until I further my research and purhaps, with time, place, opportunity and providing potential I may find that all religions to some degree support the understandings of Self and (1). Perhaps, I may even be wrong..."To err is human", but who is to say? I believe only I may say whether my ideas are right or wrong as they are not based solely off of a tangible substance, but rather the potential of the same. Whether or not I am right, you are not wrong to agree or disagree, but do not think for a second I will acquiesce to ignorant requests of proof of an idea. I am not here to convince the world of my "Rightness". I'm here to prove to myself of my "Wrongness". Whatever small differences or inconsistencies may occur within my statements isn't the cohesive, coallescent, context of what I've been saying, but it's a good tactic to use to get away from potentiality of "Wrongness". Shame, Fear, Shock; all great emotions perhaps missused and anger and denial and hateful words with the context of "You don't exist, so shut the fuck up and leave me the fuck alone" tone written all over them. I am going to write a book about all of this, but first I'm doing the research up till that. So please, do us both a favor and do what you want using your own words and your own choices and your own voice. YOU EXIST! YOU DESERVE EVERYTHING YOU DESIRE! YOU MATTER! YOU ARE SOMEBODY! YOU ARE. The question for you is, "Do you believe..." ...in yourself.