Why does AnOnYmOuS 2U put me to sleep?

It's strange, I can grasp all the points made by AnOnYmOuS 2U, and yet the cadence of his words sends me into a lull, like the tides moving at the hour of twilight, making me drift off into melancholic exhaustion.  What is the cause of this?

YES!!! Believe it or not I have personally observed this myself!!! I have observed this when listening to my mother talk and to my uncle talk, my eyes begin to slowly glaze over. From my own postulations I gather that this reaction comes from a deep seeded idea that we know what they mean and that they should shut up and go away. YES! Some of what I say makes some sense, but it needs to be put into the context to which it fits and interpretted diligently. To simply accept it is no different than misinterpretation to the complete misogeny that creates the glazing effect of the eyes. It literally puts you to sleep. All conjecture will do that, that's where your personal intersts come in handy. If you observe this and place it along side your own personal understandings and they are fruitless or already known the glazing begins and sleep sets in. But, when this is performed and self-awareness happens we become more aware of our surroundings and of ideas and possibilities. This is one of the basis of my faith.

>>1
Obviously, he is a CIA test program for invading the blogs and boards and stopping productive conversation.

For that matter, so am I.

If I'm CIA, why the fuck am I drawing unemployment RedNuts? Test programs? You don't even know that there are people on the other ends of these computers do you? I bet you think they are as intangible as yourself. Think again, RedEye. The only thing you need to evaluate is yourself; better have a professional do it though, you're just fucking it up even more so that I'm here to stay. And permiate the evidence of your own stupidity to your own defeat. Thanks yet again for ammo to use in further postings and thank you for reading to the end of this thread to further waste your time instead of getting laid. :P

>>4
You know what?  That's just what a CIA test program would say.

Ah, I see what you're after now. My identity as a human being. Tuff shit RedSack. Think I want to be taunted by an intangible such as yourself. I'd rather mire myself in my own shit and tongue snakes for a living than suffer your foolishness any longer, but still I do like to see the little puppy chase its own tail. :P

I think you should take some english classes at a local community college to help diminish the chance of writing a run on sentence at the risk of having a dangling participle or sentence fragment but also to improve your spelling as it needs some work though it seems like some of your typos are entirely intentional yet I would say focus more on punctuation including commas periods semicolons etc and make sure you use indents and paragraph breaks for every new idea or subject as a rule maybe every five lines or sentences and also try to condense your sentences by avoiding useless words like that and like and sort of which can simply make reading more arduous as unneeded words are there making the entire paragraph tl;dr

>>1
He's just a rambling windbag, like RC.

>>8
That's just a flaw in the code of the CIA test program that represents itself as "AnOnYmOuS 2U".  I have a superior codebase.

In other words, I properly format my paragraphs.

>>9
religifag

Heh...I already understand why I am the center of attention, which I couldn't care less about, (my hypothesis of "Objects of Attention") but do you really need to focus your rants to the discredit of my ideas on account of spelling and proofreading? It's a bit "immature" isn't it? This is a Math and Science board is it not? Well, how do you fuel science? My method is with mystery. To be fueled by confusion, conflict, discomfort and curiosity for something that may be occuring, but perhaps my awareness isn't yet perceiving.

Hypothesis of Objects of Attention

My hypothesis of objects of attention stems from attention being focused primarily on the emitter or source of observed or recently discovered activities that are either a benefit, a conflict, or of unknown potential significance. However, the primary focus of this hypothesis is on the observer. "The scientist observing the scientist". I find that often there are focuses upon an object or person due to said activity or inactivity. However, due to lack of communication with people who are the object of attention the entire idea and research of the significance of the activity emitted by the source is usually entirely disrupted and forgotten by lack of respect for the object due to lack of respect by the observer. I find this the most vile form of betrayal that any observer or scientist can exhibit during interaction. It was with greater consideration that I delve deeper into the understanding of the observer and this phenomenon and to my astonishment I found that there is a phychological phenomena that occurs within the human observer that constitutes this activity utilizing basic chemical reactions to stimulate physical discomforts and reactions from its host. This is the human ego. The human ego as I have reasearched prides itself on being the sole contributor to its own existence and yet it is the smallest portion of us, but how do divide this ego from self was an entirely different subject and began to lead off from my original hypothesis. It was a great revelation to me upon discovering this as this awareness is the basis of self-awareness as it too applies to myself, the observer, the emmiter, the source. End of Hypothesis.

This guy reminds me of Nietzsche, without the genius.

The guy has a point, but what's missing...Oh, practice maybe?