>>10
so, i'm just pointing out some things i don't like about this argument:
"The degree of humility and suppression of your own will is dependent on the how superior the object of worship is to yourself"
im not sure how this is clear
"You bend perfectly to its will, no exceptions."
this supposes people are capable of perfectly doing things.
"it would be perfectly benevolent and therefore would not WANT you to worship it and anything that demands or even suggests such worship is truly monstrous and automatically becomes unworthy of worship and rather defiance."
this essentially is the argument and conclusion here, and it doesn't seem justified very well at all. how does one conclude that something perfectly benevolent would not want you to worship it? the "and therefore" here seems a bit unsatisfactory. why do things which suggest worship become unworthy? why should people defy monstrous things?