Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Fractals

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-11 13:31

I used to get really mindfucked by fractals. How can something exist in a fraction of a dimension? How is it that the sphereflake can have an infinite surface area and a finite volume? We can imagine fractals and even draw them to a great deal of accuracy but a true fractal cannot exist in the physical universe.

That's the answer to both of those questions. Fractals simply don't exist. And infinite area within a finite volume isn't really all that bizarre. In fact any three-dimensional space contains an infinite amount of area. Think of a cube. It can be viewed as a stack of an infinite number of squares. Just like a line can be thought of as an infinite number of line segments.

Anyway, fuck fractals.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-11 14:47

Lines don't exist either. Go fuck yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-11 15:01

Just like a *square* can be thought of as an infinite number of line segments.

fuck, I can't think straight

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-12 7:58

lern2 calculus

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-12 9:47

no, I would rather you tell me all I need to know about calculus

Name: CSharp !FFI4Mmahuk 2008-04-13 0:08

>>1
Real things can't have an infinite surface area, eh? What a realization!
BITCHES DON'T KNOW BOUT MY PLANCK LENGTH

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-13 18:32

you see, it can be said the cube is made of....

ah, fuck, my mind is screwed! fuck!

Name: RedCream 2008-04-15 5:06

If a cube is an infinite stack of squares, and a square is an infinite stack of lines, and a line is an infinite stack of points, then a point is an infinite stack of ... what?

>>6
False, Sir.  I hear bitches talking about your plank, at length.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 8:44

Infinite = God.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 16:07

>>8
Formally, you'd be speaking of line segments, not lines.

Name: CSharp !FFI4Mmahuk 2008-04-15 16:08

>>8
Er—oh. Um. Thanks, sir.

Name: RedCream 2008-04-16 13:21

Can you say that a point is an infinite stack of points?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 14:39

>>12
You sure can. But you'd be wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 14:44

          ∧_∧   / ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄
          ( ´∀`) < COOL Free Ringtones! http://youtube.com/watch?v=F2WwEtKdjwg
        /    |    \________
       /       .|     
       / "⌒ヽ |.イ |
   __ |   .ノ | || |__
  .    ノく__つ∪∪   \
   _((_________\
    ̄ ̄ヽつ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ | | ̄
   ___________| |

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 15:34

>>12
How about a point is an infinite stack of nothing?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 23:48

>>12
How about a point is an infinite stack of SHUT THE FUCK UP?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 0:44

>>12
How about a point is an infinite stack of NIGGERS

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 8:52

>>12
How about a point is an infinite stack of PANCAKES?

HA HA HA HA HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE AHA HA I made a funny!!

Name: RedCream 2008-04-17 13:09

It looks like you fags are well on your way to an infinite stack of fucking morons.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-18 2:16

How about a MANTRAIN is an infinite stack of FAGGOTS?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-18 23:43

How about this TOPIC is an infinite stack of FAILURE?

Name: RedCream 2008-04-19 1:05

>>21
That's a corollary to what I said in >>19.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-20 12:21

well
if the naturals set can be formed from empty sets and the R from the N, calling the line as R, why can't I say that the dots are the subsets of R and each one can be formed with the N elements, which are specific dots formed from nothing

so i guess >>15 was right

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List