Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

First we stick a cat in a box...

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 18:25

OK, so can someone explain to me the difference between these two scenarios:
1 - we do Schroedinger's cat experiment.
2 - we stick a dude in a box with a coin, a cat, and a club, and he kills the fucking cat if the coin flip comes up heads.

Assume that there's no way for information to get out of the box until we actually open it and look inside.  In either situation, it seems to me that we've got a 50/50 chance when we open the box of seeing a live versus a dead cat.  After the magic moment has passed (one half-life or the dude's flipped the coin), we've got either a dead cat or a live cat, not like 50% of a live cat, we just don't (can't) know which until we actually look.

I've seen people arguing that setup (1) is different because of QUANTUMS, but I've never had it adequately explained to me how a random quantum event is different from any other random event.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 18:39

/b/ is that way  ----->

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 20:05

You do not understand Half-Life.

Go to www.gamefaqs.com

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 20:11

These are both adequate analogies of the wave super-position hypothesis of Quantum.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 20:22

Cat with club in mouf standing on human who was beaten to death.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 20:35

Indepent discovery of Wigner's friend or just a dumbass who hates cats? WHO KNOWS?

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 20:36

>>6
Independent. Independent.
Man, it doesn't even look like a word anymore now.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 20:49

>>6
Hey, only a 1/4 chance of both cats surviving.  I call them good odds.

Fucking cats.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 21:26

No fair! You changed the outcome by measuring it.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-22 21:44

>>9
See, now that's the kind of Futurama quoting this board needs more of.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-23 0:54

>>6
I
N
D
E
P
E
N
D
E
N
T
DO YOU KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-23 1:26

Indepent discovery of Wigner's friend or just a dumbass who hates cats? WHO KNOWS?

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-23 1:27

Indepent discovery of Wigner's friend or just a dumbass who hates cats? WHO KNOWS?

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-23 1:27

Indepent discovery of Wigner's friend or just a dumbass who hates cats? WHO KNOWS?

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-23 7:20

Indepent

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-23 8:52

>>11-15
Kind of doesn't work when it was corrected in the very next post, typofag.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-23 9:40

>>16
lern2spel

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-23 15:55

>>11-15
Kind of doesn't work when it was corrected in the very next post, typofag.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-23 15:56

>>11-15
Kind of doesn't work when it was corrected in the very next post, typofag.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-23 15:56

>>11-15
Kind of doesn't work when it was corrected in the very next post, typofag.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-23 15:56

>>11-15
Kind of doesn't work when it was corrected in the very next post, typofag.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-23 16:19

Hey guys I see this thread as a lot of replies and I look forward to seeing the lengthy arguments presented therein

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-23 16:23

Either quantum phenomena are like normal random events or the other way round.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-23 17:15

Quantums are magic just like fucking zombie jesus.  He killed the cat.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-23 17:37

It puts the cat in the box or it gets the hose again.

PUT THE CAT IN THE FUCKING BOX!

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-23 18:31

>>25
lern2spel typofag

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-24 7:39

>>1

gb2 school: dude, coin and cat are macroscopic. no quantum effects at play there.

the fact that you don't know what happens inside does not make it quantum superimposed.

lrn the difference between quantum effects and statistical probability.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-24 13:14

>>27
situation 1 is different because of QUANTUMS!  They allow us a magical half-cat!

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-24 13:17

trick question:
if i flip two coins what are the chances for both to have the same side?

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-24 13:28

>>27
I think OP is arguing the other side, that the idea of Schroedinger's cat being half alive and half dead is pretty stupid.

Which, y'know, was kind of the point that Schroedinger himself made.

Name: 4tran 2008-03-24 18:30

>>29
50%

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-24 19:05

Quantum Physics is bunk.  You can't argue with Schroedinger.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-25 16:21

>>30
Yeah, Schroedinger actually devised the analogy in an attempt to refute what he saw as a ridiculous consequence of the mathematical treatment of quantum physics.
And then it got used in lectures around the world for precisely the opposite aim =D

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-27 8:45

>>31
Incorrect ;-).

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-27 8:50

>>33

... by religiousfags and newagefags.

Quantum consciousness my ass!

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-27 18:42

>>34
/facepalm

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-27 20:10

Hey girl I got somethin' real important to give you
So just sit down and listen
Girl you know we've been together such a long long time
And now I'm ready to lay it on the line
You know it's Christmas and my heart is open wide
Gonna give you something so you know what's on my mind
A gift real special, so take off the top
Take a look inside -- it's my cat in a box
Not gonna get you a diamond ring
That sort of gift don't mean anything
Not gonna get you a fancy car
Girl ya gotta know you're my shining star
Not gonna get you a house in the hills
A girl like you needs somethin' real
Wanna get you somethin' from the heart
Somethin' special girl
It's my cat in a box, my cat in a box babe
It's my cat in a box, my cat in a box girl

See I'm wise enough to know when a gift needs givin'
And I got just the one, somethin' to show ya that you are second to none
To all the fellas out there with ladies to impress
It's easy to do just follow these steps
1: Open that box
2: Put your cat in that box with a Geiger counter containing a tiny bit of radioactive substance, so small, that perhaps in the course of the hour one of the atoms decays, but also, with equal probability, perhaps none; if it happens, the counter tube discharges and through a relay releases a hammer which shatters a small flask of hydrocyanic acid.
3: Make her open the box
And that's the way you do it
It's my cat in a box... my cat in a box babe
It's my cat in a box, my cat in a box girl
Christmas; cat in a box
Hanukkah; cat in a box
Kwanzaa; a cat in a box
Every single holiday a cat in a box
Over at your parent's house a cat in a box
Mid day at the grocery store a cat in a box
Backstage at the CMA's a cat in a box
Yeah-wow-wow-wow-wow-wow
A cat in a box...

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-27 21:56

This doesn't really answer your question, but one difference is that with radiation, the sample may not decay at a steady rate.  Say the half-life of a sample is 30 days.  After 29 days, it's possible (though extremely unlikely) that the sample has not decayed at all, and half of it will decay in the last second of those 30 days.  Half-life is an average, not a set rate.

Again, I'm pretty sure this doesn't answer your question, but maybe someone who's had more physics can take it from there.

Name: 4tran 2008-03-27 22:12

>>38
Even if nothing happens to the sample for 29 days, it's pretty unlikely that half the sample will decay in that final day.  The probability that half the sample will decay in 1 day can be calculated from the Poisson distribution.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List