Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Withdrawal as a means of birth control

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-12 12:49

Discuss

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-12 13:45

Not as failsafe as reamin' the pooper!

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-12 14:24

just push the baby back in

Name: RedCream 2008-03-12 19:45

Withdrawal and the Rhythm Method are constructed from basic FAIL particles.  Anyone who uses these forms of so-called birth control are just admitting they expect to have a baby on a reasonable chance.  You'd literally have to be stupid (i.e. religious or a backwoods hickfuck) to use these methods and seriously expect to avoid pregnancy.

Cutting the man's tubes is overall the safest, cheapest and most reliable form of birth control, when you consider ALL those aspects.  If you want a kid after that, then just grab some of the thousands of children who are stuck in the foster-care and adoption systems.  Your DNA isn't special.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-13 4:48

This is where Frenchmen come from

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-13 8:29

Heroin withdrawal is a good way to kill a sex drive.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-13 21:48

>>4
>Fail particles
Didn't I tell you some time ago to interact with some dick particles?

Name: RedCream 2008-03-13 22:00

>>7
Even if I was inclined to listen to the deranged babbling that we  laughingly call "your speech", you've been observed scarfing up entire shoals of dick particles like some sort of baleen whale.  Your frenzied hunger for dick has produced a remarkable shortage, and now I'm hearing from the news that dick in any form has to be imported from Argentina at great expense.

You alone are responsible for the dick shortage.  Good god, man, take a breather from your constant, convulsive gulping!

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-14 1:04

>>8
Woah woah, is dat sum multimonth late comeback?

Name: RedCream 2008-03-14 12:46

>>9
{2008-03-13 22:00:00} - {2008-03-13 21:48:00} = {00:12:00}

In your universe, apparently 12 fucking minutes equals 2 or more months.  So that means you're probably DEAD by now, yes?

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-15 15:14

>>10
wrong again.
Didn't I tell you some time ago to interact with some dick particles?

Yes indeedy, it was a multimonth-old post.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-15 15:16

Withdraw your COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS COCKS

Name: RedCream 2008-03-15 15:37

>>11
Wrong again.  Obviously this is the first I'd heard of any such claim.  FAIL MOAR.  Notification starts from the RECEIPT, not from the SENDING.  NAO CRY MOAR.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-15 17:25

Name: RedCream 2008-03-16 1:45

>>14
You need to learn to audit a thread, cumturd.  You posted at #15, yet I only returned to that thread at #70.  SECOND PAGE, DIPSHIT.  I didn't see postings #15 through #40, which is the first page of 4chan's pagination.  Your timestamp assertion means PRECISELY DICK.

Seriously, were you born with all that brain damage, or did you obtain it later on in life from some accident?

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-16 2:23

>>15
Your failure knows no bounds.  Shutting your eyes and covering your ears will not make things go away.

Name: RedCream 2008-03-16 15:34

>>16
I haven't shut or covered anything.  I merely noted the the time of my notification was not what you assumed, from your failure to understand the intricacies of auditing threads, therefore you were wrong.  If anyone's shutting out the truth of that, it's YOU.

You haven't answered my reasonable question, either.  Were you born with your handicap, or did you develop it?

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-16 17:05

>>17
Fear not my M-M-M-MAXIMUM OWNAGE, as you say, for it is brief.  You should just accept the fact that you misunderstood, a subset of instances in which you are wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-16 18:25

C-C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER

Stop arguing, faggots

Name: RedCream 2008-03-16 19:02

>>18
I didn't misunderstand at all.  The notification times and dates were as given in my previous posting, which showed a 12-minute delay, not the months you concluded from YOUR OWN MISUNDERSTANDING of how threads can be seen.

Your continued and pointless defense of your own incorrect conclusion is what leads one to conclude your PWNAGE is set at a MAXIMUM.  All it will take to stop such a thing is for you to admit that you misunderstood that a timestamped posting is NOT the same as a proper notification.  (After all, postings can be missed in the great volume of them here on 4chan.)  Quite simply, that's the well-defined extent of YOUR MISTAKE and it only remains for you to admit it.

>>19
I'm not actually arguing, cumshitter.  I'm merely pointing out the clear facts of the matter, and that dumbshit anon continues to FAIL SPECTACULARLY by avoiding the logic of the matter.  An argument is based upon facts in dispute.  There is no rational dispute going on from that anonyfag's viewpoint.  He's just refusing to admit what is clearly true.  So it remains for me to continue to hammer the point home until he admits his error, or he leaves.  There is no third option.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-16 22:18

>>20
That's what an argument is.  Lrn2logic.

Also, stop getting trolled please.  It just makes everyone else annoyed.  The other guy obviously isn't being serious if he's saying "M-M-M-MAXIMUM OWNAGE".

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-16 22:19

Cockpenis

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-16 22:27

The cunt who floods Lounge with shit must be back from clown college.  We'll reclaim it for cactus later.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-16 23:58

>>20
>>21
Both retards.

Stop trying to arbitrarily define points of view in relation to factuality and objectivity.

Also, EGREGIOUS BBCODE.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-17 0:02

>>20
>>22
>>23
Same fag

Name: Cactus 2008-03-17 0:47

Oh /lounge/, why hath thou forsaken me?  (And all things cactilian.)

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-17 1:14

this not /lounge/, cactus fuckers.

Name: Cactus 2008-03-17 2:00

Whether this is /lounge/ or not, still I lament.  Still, I lament.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-18 1:32

>>28
Oh God you give me a boner.

Name: 4tran 2008-03-18 21:25

>>28
What happened in /lounge/?  I heard >>23 say something about it being flooded?

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List