AD/BC

Why do we contine to use the AD/BC year system when things point to Jesus not even being born in year 0 (If he ever lived).

It's just an arbitarily set point, why not just call it Before Zero and After Zero, or just simply +/-. Is the public to stupid to change this concept? Would they need a new arbitarily set point for this to happen, which would make life somewhat harder for historians?

That's why real people use CE/BCE.
Any point is going to be arbitrary, and changing it would make it harder to read older books.

So there is an alternative, now to convince the rest of the world to start using this...

But Jesus was real!  Christ lives!

So does Gilgamesh the Troll

BCE/CE = Before Christian Era/Christian Era

CE: Chaotic Evil
BCE: Beyond Chaotic Evil (read: Christian Evil)

http://plus4chan.org/boards/n/

>>6
The C stands for Common, nigger.

ad - bc

=

|a b|
|c d|



Since the year after 1 BC was 1 AD:

1 BC + 1 = 1 AD
BC + 1 = AD
AD - BC = 1

Thus,

|a b| = 1
|c d|


Since the four corners of the time cube correspond to A,B,C, and D, the time cube is equal to unity.  However, since Gene Ray, wisest human on earth, showed that unity is equal to evil, the time cube, and thus all of earth is equal to evil.  But Gene Ray also showed that God and all knowledge is equated with unity or oneness, and thus evil.  However, time cube and one god cannot coexist, and cannot both be evil.

THUS, THE TIME CUBE IS A LIE.

Also, I would like my $10,000.

Before Christ/After Descension

>>10
You, sir, are the only smart man in this thread.