No fossil evidence for human evolution

Lucy - The skeleton of a three foot tall chimpanzee.
Heidelberg Man - Built from a jawbone that was conceded to be human.
Nebraska Man - Scientifically built up from one tooth, later found to be the tooth of an extinct pig.
Piltdown Man - The jawbone turned out to belong to a modern ape.
Peking Man - Supposedly 500,000 years old, but all supporting evidence has disappeared.
Neanderthal Man - At the 1958 International Congress of Zoology, Dr. A.J.E. Cave said his examination showed that his famous skeleton found in France over 50 years ago is that of an old man who suffered from arthritis.
Newguinea Man - Dates back to 1970, found just north of Australia.
Cromagnon Man - One of the earliest and best established fossils is at least equal in physique and brain capacity to modern man.

>>13
'Homo sapiens sapiens' is not a valid subspecies because it's not what subspecies mean. Subspecies is a ->taxonomic<- rank inferior to species. It cannot be applied like you had. Leftist people in academia use this misleading nomenclature and claim it's a subspecies in order to deny actual races/subspecies, or claim races are taxonomically inferior to subspecies (LOL) in order to trivialize (current) human biodiversity. I've hit both kind of these stances quite a few times.
A single paper? Against the overwhelming evidence in favor of it?
"These findings support the RAO hypothesis" is a well-known politically correct meme in papers that *don't* actually help the hypothesis (at least not in opposition with MRE or other hypos). I guess getting off peer-review easily is worth more than integrity.
There are a lot more papers, but what's your dissatisfaction with this one?
There isn't much overwhelming proof for either one. As the paper says, probably no simple model can explain the data we have.
There are good reasons the multiregional hypothesis is still just a fringe theory, you know.
Any that don't involve morality, PC faggotry, a priori assumptions and other useless concepts in establishing something as correct or incorrect?