No fossil evidence for human evolution

Lucy - The skeleton of a three foot tall chimpanzee.
Heidelberg Man - Built from a jawbone that was conceded to be human.
Nebraska Man - Scientifically built up from one tooth, later found to be the tooth of an extinct pig.
Piltdown Man - The jawbone turned out to belong to a modern ape.
Peking Man - Supposedly 500,000 years old, but all supporting evidence has disappeared.
Neanderthal Man - At the 1958 International Congress of Zoology, Dr. A.J.E. Cave said his examination showed that his famous skeleton found in France over 50 years ago is that of an old man who suffered from arthritis.
Newguinea Man - Dates back to 1970, found just north of Australia.
Cromagnon Man - One of the earliest and best established fossils is at least equal in physique and brain capacity to modern man.

>>12
>http://harpend.dsl.xmission.com/Documents/eswaran%20et%20al%202005%20genomics%20refutes%20exclusively%20african%20origin%20jhe.pdf and they do.
A single paper? Against the overwhelming evidence in favor of it?
There are good reasons the multiregional hypothesis is still just a fringe theory, you know.

But again, even if it were true, it would be irrelevant:

Maybe it would change the wording of your rebuttal a bit.
It wouldn't, since none of it's dependent on RAO.

Not really. It just isn't *really* a proper subspecies, as per everyone else.
Repeating bullshit makes it true! Actual evidence or GTFO.

Check the leopard subspecies:
What's your fucking point?

I dislike leftist bullshit, sorry.
I dislike idiots who blame "leftists" for everything without offering the slightest bit of evidence this even has anything to do with politics.