ITT I ask libfags questions

1) Is it wrong to discriminate against certain groups, on the sole basis of skin colour (and not race), by cognitive ability? Please explain why your position position is backed by science. Refrain from answering unless you have a minimal understanding of statistics, please.

Moar questions to follow later, because I feel I'm going to have to deal with a lot of morons with this simple one.

>>4
You asked the question about a certain action. You did not ask any whether something was true or not true, or whether the action is good or not. You were asking a question about whether it is wrong or not i. e. its morality. Asking a question about morality and then denying that you did not ask such a question is FAIL.
Funny. Yes, 'wrong' can mean different things in law, ethics, science... However, and I quote myself from OP text,
Please explain why your position position is backed by science.
So I kind of put the context in. Then I said:
Refrain from answering unless you have a minimal understanding of statistics, please.
Which also corroborates my question being of a scientific nature. I can't think of an use of statistics in morality, but I admit I'm not even trying.

Then I restated my question in >>3 because at least one libfag has very hard problems understanding that -- go figure -- I ALREADY KNOW their twisted moral stance on the issue.

For some reason, you forgot to answer the restated question in >>3. I'm sure you've just overlooked it by accident.

In b4 not a straight answer and more semantics.