ITT I ask libfags questions

1) Is it wrong to discriminate against certain groups, on the sole basis of skin colour (and not race), by cognitive ability? Please explain why your position position is backed by science. Refrain from answering unless you have a minimal understanding of statistics, please.

Moar questions to follow later, because I feel I'm going to have to deal with a lot of morons with this simple one.

>>2
Wow. If you said just:
The answer is wrong.
I would have replied exactly:
Morality is not backed by science.
Of course, adding that morality is subject to change and that it's completely worthless in assessing a REAL situation. I can have Christfags denying (->human) macroevolution because they actually think that after it refutes the Christian narrative, without the concept of God there'd be no morality. And I can have libfags deny human microevolution because acknowledging human ecological differences would call for a saner public policy and their removal from the Matrix. (What I'm bewildered is that you still use evolution to annoy Christfags.) Anyway, my point is, if I ask a Christfag 'Is it wrong to believe in evolution?' I'm not asking about his moral stance on it, I'm asking if he believes it to be correct or not. And in Christfag morality, evolution might as well be morally wrong. So who cares about morality?
tl;dr, fuck off with your morality and your leftist religion, it's YOUR delusion, not mine.

Anyway, back to my question. I sought an answer: if libfags believe that I am SCIENTIFICALLY (or should I say mathematically) correct to discriminate (=differentiate) against GROUPS, on the basis of merely SKIN COLOUR, by COGNITIVE ABILITY or NOT?

I'm asking this because, when I point out that racial differences exist to members of the Church of the Left (but not limited to), they usually mumble something about "skin colour," which is a monumentally ignorant and stupid straw man. So I'm playing ball.

I already know about your sick, destructive morality. Now, try to answer my question. ;)