Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Imaginary Numbers

Name: !kuk54qxINg 2007-12-18 17:27

Are complex numbers any more imaginary than real numbers? What makes pi more real than i?

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-18 17:29

tripfag

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-18 17:29

Real numbers and imaginary numbers are just defined phrases. They aren't related to the colloquial definitions of the words "real" and "imaginary" except in an intuitive sense.

Name: !kuk54qxINg 2007-12-18 17:53

>>2
What's wrong with tripcodes?

>>3
Thanks.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-18 18:26

>>4


>What's wrong with tripcodes?
>wrong ... tripcodes
>tripcodes

Name: !kuk54qxINg 2007-12-18 18:38

>>5
I think you forgot to add a point to your post.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-18 19:36

Wait till you learn about 'impossible', 'noncomputable', 'vector', 'trivial', 'cantor' and 'final' numbers.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-18 20:11

Read SICP

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-18 20:20

holy God

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-18 20:25

>>1
Numbers are not any more or less real than others. There is no property called "realness."

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-18 20:36

>>1
There is no property called "realness."

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-18 22:57

its called imaginary because i = sqrt(-1) what number squared will  get you -1

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-19 2:56

>>12

+/- i

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-19 6:11

>>12
Ah, the obligatory middle school moron thinking he can add something to the thread.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-19 12:12

Imaginary and complex numbers are just made up to make certain things simpler... you basically define a set of pairs and define addition and multiplication and it turns out you get a field. That's pretty much it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-19 15:26

Real numbers are just made up to complete all limits of sequences of rational numbers. Complex numbers are just made up to algebraically complete the real numbers.

Now, onto REAL math! All the EXPERT ANALYSTS on this board know that 1/0 is infinity, -1/0 is minus infinity; but what is 0/0 (or, for that case, -0/0)? That question has trouble the greatest minds since Pythagoras, but I have now devised a solution! 0/0 is Nullity. What if an aeroplane or your pacemaker divided by zero? Thanks to my discovery of Nullity, you are safe.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-19 16:13

-0=0
0/0=1

Name: RedCream 2007-12-19 19:15

A Cartesian field using imaginary numbers produces real numbers as areas.  Cool ... so does that mean if -1 is a 0 dimensional entity, then i is a -1 dimensional entity?

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-19 20:17

>>18

No. Idort.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-19 20:18

>>18
I don't want to sound rude, but your babbling like a retarded middle school student.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-19 21:41

>>17
You are wrong about the second one. It is INDETERMINATE. Limits of those forms can sometimes be evaluated using L'Hospital's Rule.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-19 21:42

>>18
I want to sound rude, because you really are babbling like a retarded middle school student.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-19 21:52

>>22
He's no Mr. Science, that's for sure.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-19 23:24

>>7
THIS IS MADNESS.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-20 0:15

>>20
What I meant to say was obviously "your babbling like a retarded middle school student is irritating me."

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-20 0:37

Jeepers, you guys are rude

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-20 8:48

0/0 is rude!

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-20 14:59

>>16
0/0 is indeterminate. Limits approaching 0/0 can have all sorts of values.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-20 15:35

>>28

0/0 is NULLITY, a new number which I use to solve 1200-year-old problems. For instance, the likes of Newton and Euler wondered, "What is 0^0?". Thanks to my INNOVATION, I can prove that 0^0 = 0/0 = Nullity. I should have mailed it to the Marx brothers!

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-20 15:49

michio kaku

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-20 16:40

>>29
Question: what is NULLITY*5?

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-20 17:03

>>21

is L'Hopital, not L'Hospital

>>1
Imaginary numbers are a tool used to represent and predict reality, just like irrational numbers, rational numbers, integers, and counting numbers.  They are useful for, say, multiplying cos(t) with 2*cos(t + 30 degrees).  Euler's Identity with e^(j*t) = cos(t) + j*sin(t)

note:  EE here so I use sqrt(-1) = j by habit.  Also the j comes first, so you write it as j3.33 or something like that.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-20 18:25

In my opinion the term "imaginary" is simply because when they were first concieved they had no "real" use, and the terminology has continued. They are no more "unreal" than real numbers, they are just an extension to them really.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-20 20:33

What's nullity/0?  Can thar be imaginary nullity? lyk omg

IMAGINARY INFINITY?

My naivety knows no bounds.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-20 20:33

Michio Kaku counted to infinity... twice.

Name: RedCream 2007-12-20 22:01

Are imaginary numbers sub-dimensional?

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-20 23:28

>>32
Neither spelling is correct, idort. The correct spelling uses a character not found in English, and is "l'Hôpital". As such, all spellings using only English characters are incorrect. However, "l'Hospital" gets part marks for replacing the circumflex with an 's', as is usually the historic case, and "l'Hopital" better emulates its pronunciation. Dumbfuck. I can tell you're an EE with your shitty attitude.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-21 1:09

>>37
Calm the fuck down.

Name: !suqq7k.y1c 2007-12-21 1:17

wut?

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-21 4:38

>>37
OMG I CAEM AS YOU SPLIT THOSE HAIRS!

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List