It 'converges' to f(x)= inf at 1, 0 elsewhere. So, no, it doesn't, actually.
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-09 19:42
>>2
How would one go about showing that f(x)=0 for 0<=x<1?
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-09 20:16
the power series x^n has radius of convergence (-1,1).
when n gets big the power series converges to zero.
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-10 9:22
it converges pointwise to f(x) = infinity at 1
= 0 elsewhere
It does not converges uniformly to this though, so it does not converges.
This can be seen obviously as for any n, there exists an x < 1 such that nx^n = 1/2 ie nlnx = -ln2n
so x = exp(-1/n(ln(2n))
I'm not bothering to write out the definition for uniform convergence of sequences of functions, but if you can't see why that contradicts it, you're going to fail analysis anyway