Loved those books on physics you wrote. You didn't?! Well, now you can explain it right, then.
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-05 3:26
Michio Kaku is the nigger of physics.
Quantum Computers my ass!
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-05 22:01
>>6
what you say son
flight machines,cars,computers,internet my ass!
in my time there where no nonsense only real man, horses,telegraph and postman the flight was left to the birds
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-05 22:27
In my day, horses were food, and if you needed to hunt with anything more than a spear, you're newfangled,
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-06 16:43
>>8
bah i hate newfags in my time there where no spears or clothes
our body was cover with hair we just eat from the ground what we can get and kill our preys with rocks
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-06 16:44
bah i hate newfags in my time there where no spears or clothes
our body was cover with hair we just eat from the ground what we can get and kill our preys with rocks
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-07 16:29
bah in my time there where no life on earth
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-07 17:13
bah in my time there where no earth and heavens
and i created it
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-08 11:19
bah in my time, there was no time, in the timeless age before all that was or could ever be, even creators or creative forces
i'm not a creator, i just hung around until something appeared that was worth watching
then i watched it
after some time, fucking was invented
so when things could be fucked, i fucked them
so here i am today: a fucker
a fucker of everything
i've fucked women
i've fucked men
i've fucked dinosaurs
i've fucked knotholes into trees and dripholes into limestone
i've fucked volcanos, molten moons, and intelligent gas clouds between the stars
of course i've fucked black holes
I'M A FUCKER
that is all
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-08 13:03
I fucked you
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-08 17:46
bah in my time this was a baby universe and we came trought a white hole to this one from a paralel multiuniverse
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-08 23:51
bah in my time there wasn't. Nothing was, everything wasn't.
>>16 You fail. "Nothing" is still a defined item. You're still trumped by a previous age in which even "nothing" isn't defined. Nothing is defined, even "nothing", even "define".
Indeed, "is" could mean "ongoing now", or "had been ongoing intermittently but without indication that it will have continued". This distinction is important when considering if you "is" getting blow jobs at work, and you find yourself having to testify in court about it because some little twerp prick couldn't find anything wrong about your real estate deals from 6-10 fucking years earlier but wanted something.
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-09 15:59
>>18
your turn for: in my time plz!
Michio Kaku is the nigger of physics.
Quantum Computers my ass!
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-09 16:11
i want to chain professor Kaku up in my basement and ask him questions all day long
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-09 16:37
MICHO KAKU IS REDCREAM PROVE ME WRONG
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-11 1:40
michio kaku
1 Name: Anonymous : 2007-12-03 04:57
its over we are finished
The 5 newest replies are shown below.
Read this thread from the beginning
19 Name: Anonymous : 2007-12-09 10:26 >>18
What the fuck about "is"?
20 Name: Anonymous : 2007-12-09 14:05
Indeed, "is" could mean "ongoing now", or "had been ongoing intermittently but without indication that it will have continued". This distinction is important when considering if you "is" getting blow jobs at work, and you find yourself having to testify in court about it because some little twerp prick couldn't find anything wrong about your real estate deals from 6-10 fucking years earlier but wanted something.
21 Name: Anonymous : 2007-12-09 15:59 >>18
your turn for: in my time plz!
Michio Kaku is the nigger of physics.
Quantum Computers my ass!
22 Name: Anonymous : 2007-12-09 16:11
i want to chain professor Kaku up in my basement and ask him questions all day long
23 Name: Anonymous : 2007-12-09 16:37
MICHO KAKU IS REDCREAM PROVE ME WRONG
Name: Email:
24
Entire Thread Last 50 Posts First 100 Posts Thread List
Michio kaku is such a fucking arogant prick. he thinks he can predict the future just because he a physicist. goddamn. i wonder how much he really knows about AI.
∧＿∧ ／￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣
（ ´∀｀） ＜ im table cat! michio kaku is right my other parts are scattered in a parallel dimension due to a malfunctioning teleportation over matter hax
／ | ＼＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿
/ .|
∧＿∧ ／￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣
（ ´∀｀） ＜ im table cat! michio kaku is right my other parts are scattered in a parallel dimension due to a malfunctioning teleportation over matter hax
／ | ＼＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿
/ .|
38 Name: Anonymous : 2007-12-20 03:55
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-21 17:41
we could be in the middle of intergalactic communication and not even knowing it!!
O SHI-!
he has tenure so he can say what the fuck he wants for $$$ lolololol
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-22 20:51
∧＿∧ ／￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣
（ ´∀｀） ＜ im table cat! michio kaku is right my other parts are scattered in a parallel dimension due to a malfunctioning teleportation over matter hax
／ | ＼＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿
/ .|
38 Name: Anonymous : 2007-12-20 03:55
41 Name: Anonymous : 2007-12-21 17:41 we could be in the middle of intergalactic communication and not even knowing it!!
O SHI-!
42 Name: Anonymous : 2007-12-21 18:15 >>41
michio kaku is my new god
43 Name: Anonymous : 2007-12-21 18:15 he has tenure so he can say what the fuck he wants for $$$ lolololol
Michio Kaku builds Quantum Computar, using only his left hand.
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-24 20:02
sdfghn
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-24 20:37
∧＿∧ ／￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣
（ ´∀｀） ＜ IF U WERE KILLED TOMORROW IN A TABLE-RELATED ACCIDENT, I WOULDNT
／ | | GIVE A RATS ASS BECAUSE I WOULD BE SITTING ON MY TABLE!!redcream look at this please
Michio Kaku On Aliens, On Physics ... http://youtube.com/watch?v=uWW6_LfiJJk http://youtube.com/watch?v=PW8rgKLPHMg
/ .| ＼＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿
/ "⌒ヽ |.ｲ |
＿＿ | .ノ | || |＿＿
. ノく＿＿つ∪∪ ＼
＿（（＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿_＼
￣￣ヽつ￣￣￣￣￣￣ | |￣
WE TRUE TABLECATS
WE SIT TOGETHER
WE SIT TOGETHER ON A TABLE
send this TABLECAT to everyone you care about including me if you care. Count how many times you get this, if you 1000GET, then you're A TRUE TABLECAT!
∧＿∧ ／￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣
（ ´∀｀） ＜ IF U WERE KILLED TOMORROW IN A TABLE-RELATED ACCIDENT, I WOULDNT
／ | | GIVE A RATS ASS BECAUSE I WOULD BE SITTING ON MY TABLE!!redcream look at this please
Michio Kaku On Aliens, On Physics ... http://youtube.com/watch?v=uWW6_LfiJJk http://youtube.com/watch?v=PW8rgKLPHMg
/ .| ＼＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿
/ "⌒ヽ |.ｲ |
＿＿ | .ノ | || |＿＿
. ノく＿＿つ∪∪ ＼
＿（（＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿_＼
￣￣ヽつ￣￣￣￣￣￣ | |￣
WE TRUE TABLECATS
(Post truncated.)
Name:
Anonymous2008-01-01 18:19
∧＿∧ ／￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣
（ ´∀｀） ＜ im table cat! michio kaku is right my other parts are scattered in a parallel dimension due to a malfunctioning teleportation over matter hax
／ | ＼＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿
/ .|
>>67
Nuh-uh, I'm the real me. Those guys are the same fag.
Name:
Anonymous2008-01-05 17:18
[4:25] Rational numbers as a countable infinity
1 Name: MathMajor : 2004-12-27 13:40
This past semester I took the first halves of Introduction to Analysis and Modern (Abstract) Algebra in which, naturally, we covered the basics of the cardinalities of infinities. I understand the concepts of what makes something countable verses uncountable. I simply have an intuitive problem with the fact that the rational numbers are countable. The other basics countable infinite sets (Integers, Evens, Odds, Natural Numbers, etc.) all sit well with me. For some reason, I just have a problem accepting that the Rationals are truly countable. I understand that a definition is not arguable, but it just does not feel right.
Part of my discontent lies in the fact that like the continueum, there is no smallest positive rational number. This is not true for the previously mentioned sets. I feel that the rationals are somehow set apart from this set. If I recall correctly, it was proven that "It cannot be proven nor disproven that there exists an infinite set whose cardinality is greater than the cardinality of the countable infinite sets and less than the cardinality of the continueum (the reals)."
If anyone knows where I may be able to find more information on this, or even has an answer to my dilemma, please let me know. Thanks!
-Will
The 5 newest replies are shown below.
Read this thread from the beginning
21 Name: Anonymous : 2008-01-04 18:15
FLOOD
22 Name: Anonymous : 2008-01-05 01:18
But how are they less than the infinite complex numbers.
23 Name: Anonymous : 2008-01-05 01:59
old thread is old
24 Name: Anonymous : 2008-01-05 10:56
They are both countable, just the rationals are not well order with the operator (<)
Imagine it this way, if we define every even integer n to have "size" 1/n, and then ordered to integers according to this definition we have this list:
....10, 8, 6, 4, 2, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9.......
there is no least, and no greatest number, very much resembling the rationals.
There are ways of ordering the rationals such that there is a "least member" just that the ordering isn't using the operator (<)
The fact that they have equal cardinality is obvious consider the injection f from Q to Z