Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Retarded Algebra

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-25 19:42

I've been working on this problem in each moment of my spare time for nearly 3 days straight. If I don't figure this shit out, I'll go crazy. I think there's something simple that I'm just not getting.

a + b + c = a^2 + b^2 + c^2 = a^3 + b^3 + c^3 = 3/2.

What is the value of a times b times c?

Name: Blackmaster 2007-11-25 19:54

is this real problem? fuck god this is stupid but cuz u aksed i gues i shud say that a b and c have to be grater than 1 but less than 1.5 indipendently cuz if u square a desimal it gets smaler.

 butt fuck.... if u say a+B+C = 3/2, taht means each a b and c is 1/2. so 1/2 tiems 1/2 tiemes 1/2 is 1/8

 fuckin problem is tho is in da otha part of da equajin.... taht 1/2^2 is 1/4 and 1/4 X 3 is 1/64... so wtf???

 

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-25 20:17

One of a, b, or c is equal to 1/2.

The other two have the values (1/2)(2 +- √6).

Their product is -1/16.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-25 20:23

>>3

How did you arrive at this answer?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-25 20:47

>>3

Bullshit, 1/2 + (1/2)(2+√6) + (1/2)(2-√6) = 5/2, and their product is -1/4.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-25 21:12

>>5

replace

(1/2)(2 +- √6)

with

(1/4)(2 +- √6) you nigger

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-25 21:14

(%i1) solve([a+b+c=3/2,a^2+b^2+c^2=3/2,a^3+b^3+c^3=3/2],[a,b,c]);
(%o1)
[
[a=(sqrt(6)+2)/4,b=-(sqrt(2)*sqrt(3)-2)/4,c=1/2],
[a=(sqrt(6)+2)/4,b=1/2,c=-(sqrt(2)*sqrt(3)-2)/4],
[a=-(sqrt(6)-2)/4,b=(sqrt(2)*sqrt(3)+2)/4,c=1/2],
[a=-(sqrt(6)-2)/4,b=1/2,c
=(sqrt(2)*sqrt(3)+2)/4],
[a=1/2,b=(sqrt(6)+2)/4,c=-(sqrt(2)*sqrt(3)-2)/4],
[a=1/2,b=-(sqrt(6)-2)/4,c=(sqrt(2)*sqrt(3)+2)/4]
]

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-25 22:00

>>7

doesn't tell us how to solve it

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-26 3:13

>>8
It looks like there are 3 equations with 3 unknowns.  It looks like it's a pain in the ass to solve for a, substitute, etc.  I only had the patience to verify the above solutions with maple ... I would hope there is an elegant solution.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-26 9:50

Retarded Algebra is Retarded

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-26 12:05

Problems as that usually don't have an elegant solution. Most textbook examples are engineered to give an nice solution but if it's just some random equation it probably wont'.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-26 16:43

Okay, OP here, I think I have it.

Since the sum of a b and c must be 3/2, they must average to 1/2. There are an infinite number of combinations that can result in this, but for the sake of simplicity, I assumed that one was 1/2, and the other two were 1/2 +- x.

If you square them, you're able to solve for x, which turns out to be sqrt(6)/4.

Sub for x in the original equation and multiply the terms to get (1/2)(1/2 + sqrt(6)/4)(1/2 - sqrt(6)/4), which, as was stated above, gives a product of -1/16.

Here it is in the way I should have shown it in the first place:

a = 1/2
b = 1/2 - x
c = 1/2 + x

1/2 + (1/2 - x) + (1/2 + x) = 3/2
1/4 + (1/4 - x + x^2) + (1/4 + x + x^2) = 3/2
2x^2 = 3/4
x = sqrt(6/16)
x = sqrt(6)/4

(1/2)(1/2 + sqrt(6)/4)(1/2 - sqrt(6)/4) = -1/16.

I have not yet checked to see if that value of x works when you cube the terms, mostly due to my own laziness. I'll report back if it turns out that this solution is incorrect.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-26 18:15

well, from a geometric perspective, a+b+c=3/2 is a plane and a^2+b^2+c^2=3/2 is a sphere, so their intersection ought to be a circle, which should be simple enough to parameterize.  From there you should be just a few trig identities away from a solution.  Too lazy to do it right now.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-26 18:33

Solving for the first two eq.s, I get a=1/2+sin(t)/sqrt(2)-cos(t)/sqrt(5),  b=1/2-sin(t)/sqrt(2)-cos(t)/sqrt(5),  c=1/2+2*cos(t)/sqrt(5);  Now we just need some brave soul to put this into a^3+b^3+c^3=3/2 and hopefully we'll get some points (I'm fairly certain that if there are solutions, there'll be at least 3 of them)

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-26 18:53

There is a solution of a very similar problem at http://blog.plover.com/math/symmetric-function.html

Basically, you can
(a+b+c)^2 = a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + 2ab + 2bc + 2ac = 9/4

Subtracting a^2 + b^2 + c^2 from both sides gives

2ab + 2bc + 2ac = 3/4.     (*)

(a+b+c)^3 = a^3 + b^3 + c^3
          + 3a^2b + 3a^2c + 3b2^a + 3b^2c + 3c^2a + 3c^2b
       = 27/8

Subtracting a^3 + b^3 + c^3 from both sides gives

3a^2b + 3a^2c + 3b2^a + 3b^2c + 3c^2a + 3c^2b = 15/8    (**)

Now take (*)
and multiply it by a + b + c = 3/2, getting

2a^2b + 2a^2c + 2b2^a + 2b^2c + 2c^2a + 2c^2b + 6abc = 9/8

Multiply both sides by 3/2:

3a^2b + 3a^2c + 3b2^a + 3b^2c + 3c^2a + 3c^2b + 9abc = 27/16

Subtract (**) from this, leaving

9abc = -3/16

so

abc = -1/48.

It's quite possible that I fucked up the arithmetic somewhere, but the method I showed should work fine, as long as you do it carefully on a big sheet of paper.

Hope this helps.


Name: Anonymous 2007-11-26 19:03

>>15

Oh, I see where the fuckup is.  My expansion of (a+b+c)^3 is missing the 6abc term.


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List