Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

γ is rational

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-25 13:52

Prove me wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-25 15:15

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-25 17:14

waht is that symbol french or somethng? fuck frense.

Name: chemfag 2007-11-25 17:30

It's the activity coefficient.  It relates concentration and activity.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-25 17:43

since there's no pattern anywhere in
0.5772156649015328606065120900824024310421593359399235988057672348848677267776646709369470632917467495146314472498070824809605040144865428362241739976449235362535003337429373377376739427925952582470949160087352039481656708532331517766115286211995015079847937450857057400299213547861466940296043254215190587755352673313992540129674205137541395491116851028079842348775872050384310939973613725530608893312676001724795378367592713515772261027349291394079843010341777177808815495706610750101619166334015227893586796549725203621287922655595366962817638879272680132431010476505963703947394957638906572967929601009015125195950922243501409
349871228247949747195646976318506676129063811051824197444867836380861749455169892792301877391072945781554316005002182844096053772434203285478367015177394398700302370339518328690001558193988042707411542227819716523011073565833967348717650491941812300040654693142999297779569303100503086303418569803231083691640025892970890985486825777364288253954925873629596133298574739302373438847070370284412920166417850248733379080562754998434590761643167103146710722370021810745044418664759134803669025532458625442225345181387912434573501361297782278288148945909863846006293169471887149587525492366493520473243641097268276160877595088095126208
404544477992299157248292516251278427659657083214610298214617951957959095922704208989627971255363217948873764210660607065982561990102880756125199137511678217643619057058440783573501580056077457934213144988500786415171615194565706170432450750081687052307890937046143066848179164968425491504967243121837838753564894950868454102340601622508515583867234944187880440940770106883795111307872023426395226920971608856908382511378712836820491178925944784861991185293910293099059255266917274468920443869711147174571574573203935209122316085086827558890109451681181016874975470969366671210206304827165895049327314860874940207006742590918248759
6213738423114426531350292303175172257221628324883811245895743862398703757662855130331439299954018531341415862127886480761100301521196578006811777376350168183897338966398689579329914563886443103706080781744899579583245794189620260498410439225078604603625277260229196829958609883390137871714226917883819529844560791605197279736047591025109957791335157917722515025492932463250287476779484215, γ must be irrational!

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-25 17:50

>>3
lrn2greek

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-25 21:03

>>6
lrn2ignorebadtrolls

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-26 2:28

>>2
I don't think this proof is accepted by the mathematical community.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-26 3:16

>>9
Why not?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-26 5:40

>>9
Because of the Zionist Conspiracy.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-26 6:35

Well, not that hard...

Let's say that γ is irrational,
then γ is irrational and then γ is not rational.

Q.E.D.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-26 6:45

>>11
Except that γ is already defined.
And I don't see what quantum electrodynamics has to do with anything.

Name: bitte klicken 2007-11-26 6:56

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-26 7:01

http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=l2ZXcVsqNGQ&feature=related
haha your talking me you shitfaced cockmaster how fucking smart are u to have the courage to diss me over the internet acting all tough and shit man give me ur address i will cut ur ass up. HEres mine edmonds, washington 202 9th Ave. S. 98020 IF you want to do some real shit then shut me up but if not fuck my balls

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-26 17:39

>>14
donkey raping shit eater!

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-28 3:42

>>1
the value of gamma in the lorenz transformations is in fact rational --> 1/(sqrt(1-(v/c)^2))

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-28 18:17

It's fucking easy. Set γ = sinh(s) for some s. sinh(s) is irrational so γ is irrational by the equality condition.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-28 18:20

>>17

O shit I was meant to prove it was rational. Just multiply both sides by a rational number (1) and they'll both be rational

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-28 19:05

>>17
Uh...no. sinh(s) is continuous, and so there's certainly values of sinh such that it's NOT irrational. For example, sinh(ln(2)) is rational.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-28 19:34

>>17
>>18
Jesus, this is the funniest thing I've seen all week.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List