>>24
Not only is E. O. Wilson senile enough that he wrote a bad peer-reviewed study, but also every single recent study he references in support of his claims along with the consensus in academia is faulty as well, just so Dawkins is right?
Oh my, Dawkins is quite worshipped.
Anyway, the paper is excellent and anyone should read it to understand the debate on that and why Dawkins is a failure.
As for Watson's remarks, anything factually wrong with them? Human evolution didn't stop at the neck, you know. We can argue about that if you want.
Of course, there's a shorter way.
Go here, read, weep:
http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/10/james-watson-tells-inconvenient-truth_296.php
I win.