Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Base 10 vs. Base 12

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-18 18:48

ITT we discuss why we use base 10 and why base 12 is superior.
 

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-18 21:42

the guys with 12 fingers can feel gooder

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-19 2:07

There'd finally be 10 months in a year, 20 hours a day (in two 10-hour intervals) and 50 minutes in an hour.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-19 2:20

>>3
Remember this moment, people: 80 past 2 on April 47th.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-31 18:24

>>3
That puts exactly 1000 minutes into an day, which would be much simpler than the crazy numbers we have now.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-31 19:06

I'm for base 11. There are 11 dimensions in superstring theory, there are 10 fingers + cock (girls should not bother, they are supposed to be in the kitchen anyway).

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-31 19:21

>>6
Isn't the female equivalent of a cock a clit?  I win.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-31 19:32

>>5
1000 isn't as simple in base 12.

Name: anon 2007-10-31 21:57

>>8
Says you.  1000 is 1000.  0123456789AB <-- Look!  Base 12's digits!  1000 in base 12 is less simple <i>when converted to base 10</i>.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-31 23:11

base 1000 to represent 1000 is easy :)

Ϩ = 1000

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-01 0:50

base FATMOUSE crushes all others

Name: !xZtRIpFaG2 2007-11-01 1:37

base e. count apples in that bitches!

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-01 7:28

You fucking base faggots, universal truth

1eNn = nN

simple.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-01 7:44

ブッカケ

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-01 11:47

You want base ブッカケ? That could be fun.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-01 17:01

base ?????
Goes:
1,
2,
?????,
Profit!!!

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-01 17:38

base 10 is easier for the little people studying maths in high school, because logs screw with their heads enough.

OMG it's indices gone wrong!

Name: RedCream 2007-11-01 19:12

"10 your base are 12 to us"

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-01 20:17

>>16
FAIL

*fix*
base ?????
Goes:
0,
...,
?????,
Profit!!!

Name: anon 2007-11-01 21:29

"because logs screw with their heads enough."

Natural logarithms, even more so.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List